Man... he's still unproven... accept it.
So what if he’s unproven lol
Contracts aren’t just handed out to proven players lol
What are you even arguing? What do you want me to accept?
That your entire premise is faulty?
On one hand you’re arguing that Suzuki isn’t proven this doesn’t deserve a contract that is designed on a projection.
Yet on the other you’re saying that Tkachuk, whose got a similar career PPG but doesn’t have the post season experience and numbers that Suzuki has, is proven?
Sorry, all due respect but you’re not making much sense.
Unless you’re dealing with a generational player coming on his ELC, you’re not paying him for what he’s proven, you’re paying him for what you think he can become.
The more you buy into that projection, the more it costs.
It’s really not that complicated, at least conceptually, it isn’t.