RayzorIsDull
Registered User
Why were the GMs fired?. Go back to when this comp stuff started. If its directly related to taking those picks and nothing else Im wrong.
But 80 % of GMs are probly turned over without the rule
Its worked out for some, not for others, wait n see on the recents. Just like any moves GMs make.
I like aggressive GMs that take calculated risks. Are u suggesting because its there jobs on the line they all be conservative?
Just like coaches, most run a cycle in minors or pros. Thats why the 80% flip in 6/7 years.
There's a difference between being conservative and calculated risks. I don't believe every GM is horrible at trades. I believe some GM's are horrible at trades to make up for not being strong at drafting therefore they have to make up for it in other areas. Most GM's move on it's not always a promotion for example a guy like Drinkill or Sinclair if their teams continue to flounder would still find a job in hockey.
I think a GM like DeGray is conservative you rarely see them make splashes in the summer or at the deadline. Yet they have probably been the best drafting team in the past 4 years. Conservative isn't bad, in fact as a Windsor fan I would take extremely conservative over what I've seen recently.