Its Russian roulette strategy, in a league built on "defense wins championships, and offense sells tickets".
I think you should go take a look at where Cup champs tend to rate offensively.
Its Russian roulette strategy, in a league built on "defense wins championships, and offense sells tickets".
Thank god.
I just hope we start on the road and got absolutely destroyed by Boston, even sweeping us, so Dubas can fire this whole joke of a coaching staff.
I want everybody gone. The strech pass bull****, the terrible PP, the zero effort beginning of the games, the nonsense comments by Babcock favouring non factor players. The zero system or structure or whatever we have.
Get the **** off from this talented team and stop ruining it.
Which leads us to the only statistic about Nylander that matters: Since Dec. 6 until now the Leafs record places them 10th in the eastern conference - not good enough to be in the playoffs (quoted from Toronto sports radio this morning).
I think they've been playing that before most/all home games this year - Definitely saw it before the new year.Two guys 4 rows in front of us did that and took grief from all sides afterwards.
They never came back to their seats for the 2nd.
Booing the Team leaving the ice after the 1st is less cut and dry.
I think that more comes down to those who shelled out for their one game a year, brought their kid and were disappointed.
I don't think anyone who attends often were booing. Other years they've deserved it, not this season.
Interesting that they played a video a few times last night about diversity and how to behave at games.
It wasn't specific to Leaf games but also Raptor, TFC, and Argos.
My last game was the Edmonton game two weeks ago so not sure if this started recently or was a response to what happened with Rielly on Monday.
Yeah, I can be oblivious at times.I think they've been playing that before most/all home games this year - Definitely saw it before the new year.
It’s like being down 0-2 in a playoff series.
It can be corrected but you need to channel some inner aggression and work for it.
The concerning part is looking at a team that seems passive and unresponsive.
Babcock holds blame as do the players.
Babcock needs to do a better job adjusting to how these guys play.
Yes I want more physical/aggression/forecheck/puck pursuit but if they can’t do that you have to adapt to what they can.
As for Matthews, he is striking me as a moody player. He needs to get over that.
agree with the rest of your post but not sure where this idea comes from? I see a coach who rests his star players far more than your average coach (hasn't everyone been complaining about minutes for the teams stars?). I don't think he plays Andersen because of some "way" he is sworn to follow he just wants hoe ice for the playoffs. It's not that unusual for good teams with a questionable backup goalie. Andersen has played 3022 minutes this year. Just quickly looking at some other good teams with a questionable backup goalie - Winnipeg played their starter 3069 minutes Washington 2087 LasVegas 3455 Tampa 2664 Montreal 3225 Nashville 2735 San Jose 3112.Our goalie has looked very tired past 3 games. This is starting to look like a problem. He needs much more rest. But this is not the babs way. He believes at his core that you put on your work boots and fight your way through issues. .
I will say that adversity can be good? That's about the only positive I guess...
Coaches should have more tools to get the team going besides yelling in the intermissions and changing the goalie.
I don’t think we are getting by either without these elements, but if you don’t have them, or have management that doesn’t recognize getting them, you still have to do the best with what you have.As much as you and I agree on quite a bit. Couldn't disagree more here. There is no team that can win without being willing to do what you want more of. There is no winning style that doesn't involve a certain amount of those elements...including the recent Cup wins by Pitt.
There is a big difference between being expected to perform and being able to perform and that is what we are talking about here. It is not like NHL competition is going to take it easier on you because you are sick. The very fact that the team did not even practice Tuesday because of the flu should tell us all we need to know.Former NHL players say it all the time.
if you go to work - sick or not - you are expected to perform. end of story.
The choice to get rid of them was GM, the choice to keep them in the press box (Leivo forever and Martin down the stretch/playoffs) was coach, so clearly neither thought it was in the best interest to have them on the ice.Which also begs the question: whose decision was it to substitute big physical 4th line board-possession players like Matt Martin and Josh Leivo for diminutive water bug skaters like we have on the other three lines? Seriously, who decided this was the way to go? Coach? GM?
No one gives a rats a**. I wise man once told me don't bother to tell people when you are sick because they truly don't care. If you can't get job done then call in sick.There is a big difference between being expected to perform and being able to perform and that is what we are talking about here. It is not like NHL competition is going to take it easier on you because you are sick. The very fact that the team did not even practice Tuesday because of the flu should tell us all we need to know.
I don’t think we are getting by either without these elements, but if you don’t have them, or have management that doesn’t recognize getting them, you still have to do the best with what you have.
So after I realize we aren’t getting those things, is the coaching staff doing the best to ensure we are playing the only way those guys know how?
Do we need to stack a line a la Bergeron/Marchand/Pastrnak? MacKinnon/Rantanen/Landy?You know, I have put a lot of thought into that and the big question is...can we employ another system that would benefit what we have that our players can be trusted to play without be exposed defensively?
Thank god.
I just hope we start on the road and got absolutely destroyed by Boston, even sweeping us, so Dubas can fire this whole joke of a coaching staff.
I want everybody gone. The strech pass bull****, the terrible PP, the zero effort beginning of the games, the nonsense comments by Babcock favouring non factor players. The zero system or structure or whatever we have.
Get the **** off from this talented team and stop ruining it.
You know, I have put a lot of thought into that and the big question is...can we employ another system that would benefit what assets our players have and yet be trusted to play without being exposed defensively?
They already had 3 guys on the perimeter: Marner (elite passer), Rielly (Norris candidate), and Muzzin (big shot) and 3 guys fighting in front of the net (Nylander won't do that), who do you think should be replaced by Nylander?Nylander was one of our best forwards tonight and was on the bench in the last minute. Way to reward your players Babs.
Although Martin was a healthy scratch under Babcock, I think it was just common sense that you can't pay a 4th liner that much. As for Leivo, Babcock just didn't like him, and probably not for his playWhich also begs the question: whose decision was it to substitute big physical 4th line board-possession players like Matt Martin and Josh Leivo for diminutive water bug skaters like we have on the other three lines? Seriously, who decided this was the way to go? Coach? GM?