Leafsman
I guess $11M doesn't buy you what it use to
- May 22, 2008
- 3,412
- 588
I didn't say that most teams did that. I said most good teams. Just as earlier I didn't say all prospects as you claimed, but top prospects.
Yes, it common practice for teams to bring up prospects for short stints to see if they are ready, but it is exactly that which the Leafs' claimed they were getting away from in favour of keeping top prospects down until they know they are ready. It was exactly this reason why they brought in a lot of depth so they wouldn't have to use their developing prospects to cover for injuries or fill in holes at the bottom of the roster.
It's laughable that people think that this stint has provided anything of value.
An injury to a D or two occurs.
Who can bring up?
Well Sandin has some experience in the NHL.
Great. How was he on the PP?
He is good at it in the AHL.
NHL?
Don't know.
How was he on the PK?
He is good at it in the AHL.
NHL?
Don't know.
How was he if he needs to play more minutes?
He is good at it in the AHL.
NHL?
Don't know.
How was he defending a lead?
He is good at it in the AHL.
NHL?
Don't know.
How was he when the game is tied?
He is good at it in the AHL.
NHL?
Don't know.
It's only laughable that you think you know what the result is of keeping him up with the big club as it just happened hours ago. Maybe wait and watch what Sandin does before making snap judgements and overreacting.
You have yet to provide any quote from anyone stating they wouldn't call up prospects?