Johnsson is not playing tonight and hes not injured....feel its for Tanev or Mcdonagh who we are both after..so they say
that's different tho, the way this team holds its cards during the season compared to during the offseason is apples to oranges.
Johnsson is not playing tonight and hes not injured....feel its for Tanev or Mcdonagh who we are both after..so they say
You wouldn't give up a 2nd for him? Lol..
If he was an 80 game a year guy he would not be available. Misses lots, but broken finger, broken thumb, broken leg and mumps have been some of the causes, and are not likely to repeat. For a club that gets out shot way too often he seems like a pretty good add for the cost. I remember how much more I preferred Hamonic last year but a healthy Tanev is more effective.
Find out what they'll say yes to, then offer 76% of that and nothing more. Same goes for his extension.Seriously people go look at his games played every year, this is not the guy we want, especially for the price a lot of you are voting for.
edit: over the last 5 seasons he’s played 76% of his games. That’s good for 62 games a year on average.
None aboveJohnsson + 1st, 1st + 2nd, 1st + JVR, 1st + 2nd + Prospect? Come on OP
that's different tho, the way this team holds its cards during the season compared to during the offseason is apples to oranges.
Hamonic was much more highly regarded then tanev has ever been. tanev has been a high point on a rebuilding stale canucks team. hamonic is the reason why you wont see teams pay that price for tanev.
I just cant see babs being pro Tanev when the kid cant stay healthy. every injury prone player we had 3 years ago is either jettisoned to robidas island or removed by trades
Tanev is a decent 2nd pairing defensive dman, nothing more.
Would be a nice add, but shouldn't cost anything close to a top young asset.
Oh fellow indian?Tanev is glassier than Amir Khan's jaw. No thanks