digging deep on that one lolSame for Claude lemieux
It was a legal and strong looking hit that if not for Matthews notoriety would be overlooked if it happened in every single game this season.
That is an unfortunate interference. Nothing more in my cleary unbiased non-homer opinion.
It was completely legal if by legal you mean a the textbook definition of boarding
Wait for the 30 minute TSN special news feature on “ the hit” to get the answer....Is there a new rule against hitting Leaf players?
5 and game I assume? ****ing dirty ass hit on a player who deosn't even have the puck. If he's injured I could easily see a few game suspension.
edit - sad to see so many biased leaf haters commenting in here. If it was their star player they would be up in arms, sigh.
Thats still 1 thread too many.Still waiting for the OP to get 1 thread a week cap
It was completely legal if by legal you mean a the textbook definition of boarding
It was very clearly not in the numbers. So no, it is not a textbook boarding.
Boarding – A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player who checks or pushes a defenseless opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to hit or impact the boards violently or dangerously. The severity of the penalty, based upon the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.