Confirmed with Link: Kirby Dach has been recalled (& is staying in the NHL)

[TLEH]

this is the Dach thread you ****ing *****e bags...show some respect for our future Captain and savior and get back on topic....nobody gives a **** about your thoughts/feelings/beliefs or your man ******* here...

Drunk on a Monday night AD?

 

[AmericanDream]

Drunk on a Monday night AD?

Dach's mom is over and she hates reading this shit in his thread...she likes Chardonnay by the way!

 

[hawksrule]

They intersect.

I know you know we usually get along on most things, but this isn’t one of them. I have half sleeves on both my arms and they’re definitely not trashy. No use trying to convince you otherwise though.

I disagree that they intersect, and I’ll give you an example. I’m close friends with a Princeton educated theologian. She is one of the smartest, warmest, most thoughtful people I will ever know, and a far better person than I could ever hope to be. She has a tat. I think it’s trashy. Yet that in no way lessons my opinion of her character on any level.

 

[Kaners Bald Spot]

Not so fast Kowalski!

EDDIE!! Where have you been????

 

[Kurtosis]

I disagree that they intersect, and I’ll give you an example. I’m close friends with a Princeton educated theologian. She is one of the smartest, warmest, most thoughtful people I will ever know, and a far better person than I could ever hope to be. She has a tat. I think it’s trashy. Yet that in no way lessons my opinion of her character on any level.

You crack me up. I applaud your refusal to change your opinion. God bless you.

 

[ChiHawks10]

I disagree that they intersect, and I’ll give you an example. I’m close friends with a Princeton educated theologian. She is one of the smartest, warmest, most thoughtful people I will ever know, and a far better person than I could ever hope to be. She has a tat. I think it’s trashy. Yet that in no way lessons my opinion of her character on any level.

Not nearly as classy and sophisticated as she should be because of the tat, though? Not snarky. Honest question.

Not going to start this again, obviously. We disagree on it, and there's no changing anyone's mind. I just find it crazy that you think that just because you're not taking a shot at someone's character, it's ok. As if judging their class and sophistication based upon their personal, preferred form of expression is somehow better?

My only post on the matter, and then I'll let sleeping dogs lie.

If I'm off in what I'm saying, feel free to correct me. That's just how I perceived your post above.

 

[AmericanDream]

I disagree that they intersect, and I’ll give you an example. I’m close friends with a Princeton educated theologian. She is one of the smartest, warmest, most thoughtful people I will ever know, and a far better person than I could ever hope to be. She has a tat. I think it’s trashy. Yet that in no way lessons my opinion of her character on any level.

 

[Kevin Musto]

#teamstrometats

 

[ChiHawks10]

#teamstrometats

I bet you have a giant face of Strome tatted across your chest. Lol.

 

[RayP]

#teamstrometats

I just assume you have the Strome version if this....

 

[ChiHawks10]

I just assume you have the Strome version if this....

Bingo! Lol

 

[BK]

I disagree that they intersect, and I’ll give you an example. I’m close friends with a Princeton educated theologian. She is one of the smartest, warmest, most thoughtful people I will ever know, and a far better person than I could ever hope to be. She has a tat. I think it’s trashy. Yet that in no way lessons my opinion of her character on any level.

It being the tat, correct? I want to make sure I have this 100% clear in that separates her from the tat completely and don't let it impact how you view her. I understand this if this is how you view it.

Not nearly as classy and sophisticated as she should be because of the tat, though? Not snarky. Honest question.

Not going to start this again, obviously. We disagree on it, and there's no changing anyone's mind. I just find it crazy that you think that just because you're not taking a shot at someone's character, it's ok. As if judging their class and sophistication based upon their personal, preferred form of expression is somehow better?

My only post on the matter, and then I'll let sleeping dogs lie.

If I'm off in what I'm saying, feel free to correct me. That's just how I perceived your post above.

I think he believe the tat is trashy not his actually lady friend. So he separates her from the tat completely as he states "Yet that in no way lessens my opinion of her character on any level."

 

[ChiHawks10]

It being the tat, correct? I want to make sure I have this 100% clear.



I think he believe the tat is trashy not his actually lady friend. So he separates her from the tat completely as he states "Yet that in no way lessens my opinion of her character on any level."

Right, but he went on to talk about class/sophistication after. Unless he was talking that their character/class/sophistication are all things he won't judge because of a tat, despite thinking the tattoos, themselves, are trashy. That's why I offered him to clarify if I'm misunderstanding.

Edit: @hawksrule I'm looking for clarification, basically. Not a fight or argument.

 

[BK]

Right, but he went on to talk about class/sophistication after.

Correct. I am interpreting it in the sense that once they are separated (by hawksrule) there they are always separated.

I know I personally am not a fan of tats but I don't use them to judge the person (unless it is a face tat then you are effed in my judgement) and I don't even use the tat tot identify the person. I just generally ignore them. Just a personal preference thing for me.

 

[hawksrule]

You crack me up. I applaud your refusal to change your opinion. God bless you.

I've already dispelled the (perhaps) misconceived notion that trashy must impinge on character. Beyond that, I'm not clear where you're disagreeing with me. How are you defining trashy?

Not nearly as classy and sophisticated as she should be because of the tat, though? Not snarky. Honest question.

I see you edited your initial comment. I never claimed to be either.

As for her, she's as great as it gets. People are complex, nuanced, everyone with many pieces to their puzzle.

Not going to start this again, obviously. We disagree on it, and there's no changing anyone's mind. I just find it crazy that you think that just because you're not taking a shot at someone's character, it's ok. As if judging their class and sophistication based upon their personal, preferred form of expression is somehow better?

My only post on the matter, and then I'll let sleeping dogs lie.

If I'm off in what I'm saying, feel free to correct me. That's just how I perceived your post above.

I don't know what the bolded "it" is that you're referring to.

It being the tat, correct? I want to make sure I have this 100% clear in that separates her from the tat completely and don't let it impact how you view her. I understand this if this is how you view it.



I think he believe the tat is trashy not his actually lady friend. So he separates her from the tat completely as he states "Yet that in no way lessens my opinion of her character on any level."

Correct, the "it" being the tat.

 

[ChiHawks10]

I've already dispelled the (perhaps) misconceived notion that trashy must impinge on character. Beyond that, I'm not clear where you're disagreeing with me. How are you defining trashy?



I see you edited your initial comment. I never claimed to be either.

As for her, she's as great as it gets. People are complex, nuanced, everyone with many pieces to their puzzle.



I don't know what the bolded "it" is that you're referring to.



Correct, the "it" being the tat.

Basically, are you saying the physical thing, a tattoo, is something you view as trashy, but you wouldn't judge someone's character, class, or sophistication level based upon their having one? If that's what you've been meaning, then yeah, totally my bad. I can understand that perspective, though I don't necessarily agree with it. I just think when one refers to something as "trashy" it's typically said as an indictment on their character, and that's where we weren't eye to eye. I think many people would assume that, logically, without further clarification.

And I edited as I wasn't meaning to be confrontational in this at all. Was just trying to clear the air about what you actually mean by it.

 

[hawksrule]

Basically, are you saying the physical thing, a tattoo, is something you view as trashy, but you wouldn't judge someone's character, class, or sophistication level based upon their having one? If that's what you've been meaning, then yeah, my bad. I can understand that perspective, though I don't necessarily agree with it. I just think when one refers to something as "trashy" it's typically said as an indictment on their character, and that's where we weren't eye to eye. I think many people would assume that, logically, without further clarification.

And I edited as I wasn't meaning to be confrontational in this at all. Was just trying to clear the air about what you actually mean by it.

The character for sure is independent, as I said from the beginning. Class/sophistication it might play in, or it might not. It's a wholistic approach.

 

[ChiHawks10]

The character for sure is independent, as I said from the beginning. Class/sophistication it might play in, or it might not. It's a wholistic approach.

Thanks for clarifying.

 

[Pez68]

Imagine thinking swearing is a sign of immaturity, or that tats are trashy, in 2019. Some people certainly show their age.

 

[TheDachKnight]

If you have a monocle and top hat tattooed on your eye and head, respectively, is that trashy? I think not good sir!

But in all seriousness, having tattoos doesn’t make you trashy. That’s such an outdated point of view.

 

[Kaners Bald Spot]

Anyway guys now that Dach is here for the entire season, what would be an acceptable first season for him in your opinion?
35 pts? 45 pts? Any other things you want to see?
What are your expectations?

 

[BobbyJet]

Anyway guys now that Dach is here for the entire season, what would be an acceptable first season for him in your opinion?
35 pts? 45 pts? Any other things you want to see?
What are your expectations?

For me Dach's point total this season is irrelevant. #1 stay healthy and learn. Start looking at stats at a later date.

 

[Ace Card Bedard]

For me Dach's point total this season is irrelevant. #1 stay healthy and learn. Start looking at stats at a later date.

Agreed.
I don't expect he'll play every game also.

 

[RememberTheRoar]

Anyway guys now that Dach is here for the entire season, what would be an acceptable first season for him in your opinion?
35 pts? 45 pts? Any other things you want to see?
What are your expectations?

As Bobby said, points are kind of irrelevant.

If he contributes say 25-30 points while staying healthy and learning, I'd say that's great.

No way am I expecting 45 from him.

 

[Hockey Stick]

If Chicago's season goes down the drain at all, or if he's not playing consistent minutes, do you think he'd be loaned to play on the WJC? Kind of like Mete a few years back?