That's right, dismiss my mention of Olympics, world championships and stick to only one sentence.
Well yes, just like you dismiss myriad of other facts and cling to the select few. Russia did win the Olympics by the way, did they not? And Finland won the gold beating Sweden, Russia and Canada in the PO as well as the USA earlier in the group stage. Teams dominated by, if not consisting fully of, NHL players. Which taken your reasoning would prove that Liiga is stronger than the NHL. And yet you take it as a proof about the KHL but backtrack on the NHL because even you realize the claim is ridiculous.
Yet you take one guy on Torpedo doing surprisingly well as this tell-all indication. How about dozens of Liiga imports that failed in the KHL?
The thing which you don't seem to understand is that nobody considers KHL to be head and shoulders above the rest. You don't need to look at WC or Olympics, you can take a look to the NHL pre-season and see teams playing their NHL roster lose to a bunch of AHLers. You can see Skelleftea lose to freaking Grenoble at home in Champions league. Record beating Tampa lost to CBJ 4-0 in the first round. You can see the whole bunch of things, that's what makes sports be sports, in general.
The better team doesn't always win, be it a single game or a short tournament. It doesn't mean there is no best or one is not better than the other and you take all the evidence rather than a few select facts you like you get a clear picture. But all you are interested in is knowing those select few arguments that support your case and make you feel very smart. It doesn't matter to you for every Belevich I can give 3 Kuuselas, Bertrands and Juntillas, ignorance is bliss.