Huh? Are you saying Fox isn't a Top 4 player? He's the best one in the group at the present moment...
Prospect Info: K'Andre Miller (D) - Part IV
- Thread starter Krams
- Start date
HatTrick Swayze
Just Be Nice
Miller Trouba
Lindgren Fox
Robertson DeAngelo
Jones Lundqvist
Hajek Schneider
Quibble with these rankings all you want, but who in the league can even sniff that organizational depth?
Lindgren Fox
Robertson DeAngelo
Jones Lundqvist
Hajek Schneider
Quibble with these rankings all you want, but who in the league can even sniff that organizational depth?
Kords
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2019
- 6,653
- 11,362
I assume he's saying big body, hard hitting shutdown guys with a dash of elite puck moving offensive weapons.
- Jan 18, 2012
- 33,924
- 51,024
no. Fox is a top4 player, that should be evident.
You win with big and mobile defenseman that can move the puck. Fox doesn't fit in that category but he's sprinkled in among those big, mobile pmd. He's an exception and his talent is magnified, if he's surrounded by players like K'andre the Giant.
I think we need a bigger sample size before we go crazy, but I’ll gladly take the crowdités for an appetizer.
I was pretty confident he would struggle in the AHL this season. I saw plenty of him the past two years and while I loved the package, I still saw him as incredibly raw. I thought part of it was the system he was in, but it wasn’t the entire story. I’m an eternal pessimist when it comes to the Rangers (for plenty of obvious reasons), but I’m usually not off the mark this much on a prospect. Glad to be proven wrong.
He’s been real real good. Love when he grabs the puck, takes it behind his own net and just blows by everyone to rush the puck up the ice. Thing of beauty.
I still don’t expect a big scoring defenseman in the NHL. But a 35-40 point guy with amazing defense is far more intriguing from my point of view.
I was pretty confident he would struggle in the AHL this season. I saw plenty of him the past two years and while I loved the package, I still saw him as incredibly raw. I thought part of it was the system he was in, but it wasn’t the entire story. I’m an eternal pessimist when it comes to the Rangers (for plenty of obvious reasons), but I’m usually not off the mark this much on a prospect. Glad to be proven wrong.
He’s been real real good. Love when he grabs the puck, takes it behind his own net and just blows by everyone to rush the puck up the ice. Thing of beauty.
I still don’t expect a big scoring defenseman in the NHL. But a 35-40 point guy with amazing defense is far more intriguing from my point of view.
Last edited:
Maybe this is more semantics but what I mean is that getting focused for 4-5 games is way easier than maintaining a high level over the course of a longer period of time.
I’m not referring to the adrenaline of a 30 second shift but rather getting dialed in for what is basically one week.
Whatever you want to call it, I think it’s incredibly premature to call Miller a 1st pairing defenseman based on these first few games.
The S5
Registered User
- Jul 27, 2017
- 4,431
- 4,249
Just thought about how awful Chara was early in his career. Big and lanky. Didn't really know how to use his size/reach.
He figured it out and had a great career. His size/strength/reach were his greatest attributes. Miller, while not as tall, has an incredible reach, is a better skater/athlete. Let's hope the kid learns how to best take advantage of his physical attributes. If he does, the sky is the limit.
He figured it out and had a great career. His size/strength/reach were his greatest attributes. Miller, while not as tall, has an incredible reach, is a better skater/athlete. Let's hope the kid learns how to best take advantage of his physical attributes. If he does, the sky is the limit.
KirkAlbuquerque
#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Rangers fans haven't had much success on the ice the last few years. Why does it bother you that people are excited about a prospect?
His biggest flaw is his ability to make reads, followed up by his sometimes questionable decision making. He loves to jump up in the play and he loves to pinch in the neutral zone. He's been caught in both situations a number of times this year. Once he learns to play within his means, he could be a monster. He has all the physical attributes you could ever want. None of this "great skater for a big man" or "surprisingly agile for his size" stuff. He's just a tremendous athlete in a huge frame. He's only limited by his ability to learn and process the game in front of him.
He may never be a #1PP option but he's the kind of player that can play all other situations and dominate.
Rempe73
RIP King of Pop
That’s exactly what I said. He doesn’t seem to be bad at anything. Like some have said, the decision making isn’t always there, but I think many rookies have similar issues, and that this won’t be a long-term problem for Miller.
Captain Monglobster
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2005
- 1,787
- 962
- Jan 18, 2012
- 33,924
- 51,024
The reads I've seen him make are great. He processes the game at a really high level.. albeit it's been less than a handful of games
He's done much better the last few games. However there were a number of plays early on where he'd pinch in the neutral zone and get caught behind the play or leave his partner out to dry. Certainly something that can be worked on and based on the improvement over the last few games it's clearly something that the team is coaching him on.
- Jan 18, 2012
- 33,924
- 51,024
Decision making comes with experience. At least he can process the ice and make reads from what limited gameplay I've seen. I'd rather him be too aggressive to start, than too passive.
It's still early but he's got me more excited than all the other kids.
I’m a Rangers fan. I just think it’s way too early to say Miller is a 1st pairing defender after a handful of games.
I’d be thrilled if he does end up as a 1st pairing D though. Tbh I’d be happy if he ends up as a solid top-4 D given where he was drafted.
I’m just preaching patience. A season is a long time but I’ve been around long enough to see players form take significant changes from one season to another to know that a few games means little. Especially in a season with no preseason.
kovazub94
Enigmatic
- Aug 5, 2010
- 12,561
- 8,414
Yeah, Lundell was the other 50 I was referring to, and it’s obvious that forward (center) would be a priority. Just referring to the fact that Schneider was very highly valued by the Rangers to the point there’d be a discussion.
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 44,882
- 40,425
It’s amazing how quickly things change. Our right side now is stacked and we’re looking a little shaky on the left. Couple years ago was the complete opposite
NYSPORTS
back afta dis. . .
- Jun 17, 2019
- 7,993
- 4,459
i think Hajek was doing just fine establishing himself as an after thought well before Miller.
Fitzy
Very Stable Genius
- Jan 29, 2009
- 35,156
- 21,978
college classes are not very difficult nowadays unless you’re majoring in a stem field so my sympathy is limited
Yeah, the kid got scratched when he was in the Czech League earlier this year, and that league has declined in quality pretty precipitously. If you can't play in that league you're not going to be able to succeed in the AHL, let alone the NHL.
No, the reason he gave was "on the ice". Basically that everyone is where they're supposed to be.
