SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 52,769
- 34,832
He shouldn’t get anything.
Refs should be fined for the garbage allowed in this game, and that goes both ways.
It was a cross check to the face. It's a suspension.
He shouldn’t get anything.
Refs should be fined for the garbage allowed in this game, and that goes both ways.
if only this could've happened before so management could've done something to address it this year.
A high cross check is exactly what Debrusk deserved, but Kadri is def getting mutliple games for that with his history. It sucks too because nobodys mentioning Chara slamming Kadris head into the boards with two hands right after. If Kadris gonna get tossed for a retaliatory crosscheck after the borderline hit on Marleau, why is there no call on Chara?
There is no proof of that.It was a crosscheck to face. If that’s not a suspension, what is?
At least 2. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was 4 or 5 to ensure he isn’t back in this series.
He deserves whatever it ends up being
It was a cross check to the face. It's a suspension.
It’s going to be two.
Kadri is the epitome of an idiot.
Stupid. Dangerous. Waste.
He ruined the chance to come back in this game.
And now he’s going to be out, negating the depth advantage we have at forward.
Are you sure you are a Leafs fan?Kadri׳s a piece of garbage as well as an idiot. Should get two games.
There is no proof of that.
Where is the replay that shows stick on face?
Not saying he does not deserve it though.
What would Pasta get one for?
I agree if that's the best Mathews has to giveBro you even know hockey ?
Nazem did the right thing.
Ask where was our depth. You know our golden boy and kasperi and jhonsson and tavarez
Nazem is not your concern
Boston laid a trap for Kadri and he fell for it, hook, line, and sinker. Embarrassing.
...and which of them was suspension worthy?The guy was head hunting the entire first period.
I’m not sure if this is sarcasm?
There’s proof because games are put into TV?