duul
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2010
- 10,462
- 5,083
I disagree entirely.Disagree. Larsson is underpaid for what he brings. 4M is nothing in today's cap world and Larsson is a legit top 4 Dman. Jones\Lagesson don't come close to what he brings defensively yet.
We like to rag on Larsson and Russell but just because they aren't producing offensively doesn't mean they are not a big part of our wins.
I've gone through all the top teams in the league. It's no coincidence that the top teams standings-wise in the NHL also boast the highest scoring defensive corps'. Now you can say something like oh, shutdown defencemen are important still in your top 4. Statistically I don't think that holds up.
Washington top 4 D:
Carlson - 13
Orlov - 3
Kempny - 3
Gudas - 2
total: 21
Boston top 4 D:
Krug - 5
Mcavoy - 0
Chara - 5
Carlo - 4
total: 14
St. Louis top 4 D:
Pietrangelo - 12
Dunn - 7
Parayko - 2
Faulk - 4
total: 25
Edmonton top 4 D:
Klefbom - 5
Nurse - 4
Bear - 4
Larsson - 0
total: 13
As you can see, Boston and Edmonton are being absolutely carried by their 4 scorers who sit in the top 6 of NHL scoring. Similarly built teams that heavily rely on 2 or 3 players to carry them to victory, and just scraping by defensively.
Is it any coincidence the last two Stanley Cup champions also boast two of the highest scoring defensive groups? Halfway through the season...imagine if we added 8-10 goals from our blueline alone. How many extra wins does that end up being? 4? Imagine 4 more wins and 4 less losses. We would be dominating the pacific and have a playoff spot all but locked up at this point.