Jon Cooper says Kadri goal shouldn’t have counted, but wouldn’t say why

[josra33]

Except the Tampa players clearly made a legal change while the avalanche clearly didn’t. Simply being on the ice mid change is not a too many men penalty.

6 skaters were outside the 5 foot range so rule 74.1 should have gone against them too.

 

[bluesfan94]

So you would just ignore the fact that Tampa had more men on the ice when Kadri scored than Colorado?

Given how often it seems to happen in the playoffs, I would have been surprised if anybody had been whistled for a penalty on that play.

Yes because there is a rule about that. A rule followed by Tampa and blatantly violated by Colorado.

6 skaters were outside the 5 foot range so rule 74.1 should have gone against them too.

I haven’t seen that angle yet, but regardless, the goal shouldn’t have counted. We can all agree on that, correct?

 

[josra33]

Yes because there is a rule about that. A rule followed by Tampa and blatantly violated by Colorado.

Incorrect, both broke rule 74.1

Yes because there is a rule about that. A rule followed by Tampa and blatantly violated by Colorado.


I haven’t seen that angle yet, but regardless, the goal shouldn’t have counted. We can all agree on that, correct?

Thems the breaks.

 

[Antiramie]

Incorrect, both broke rule 74.1


Thems the breaks.

Are offsetting penalties better than a GWG against you?

Asking for a friend.

 

[josra33]

Are offsetting penalties better than a GWG against you?

Asking for a friend.

Colorado has had their fare share of shit calls against us. We moved on from them. You should too. Winning teams get passed them. Just like Tampa the last few years. You get some breaks, you lose some breaks. No sense in crying about it.

 

[SI90]

As an isles fan I’m still pissed about this. It happens

 

[bluesfan94]

Incorrect, both broke rule 74.1


Thems the breaks.

An illegal goal deciding a Stanley Cup Final game isn’t just a “them’s the breaks” moment. It’s a “the nhl drastically f***ed up” moment. And it’ll likely lead to a change in the replay rules because if there’s one thing Colorado can do, it’s cheat so blatantly that the replay rules change.

 

[josra33]

An illegal goal deciding a Stanley Cup Final game isn’t just a “them’s the breaks” moment. It’s a “the nhl drastically f***ed up” moment. And it’ll likely lead to a change in the replay rules because if there’s one thing Colorado can do, it’s cheat so blatantly that the replay rules change.

If the replay rules didn’t change from Tampa winning last year from it, they won’t change this year. Was that break for them too last year?

 

[DownIsTheNewUp]

Or when you're not 18M over the cap

Goals with a roster 18mil over the cap due to cap circumvention count according to Cooper however.

Please post the Tampa roster that was 18M over the cap. I'll be waiting.

 

[not a troll]

Yes because there is a rule about that. A rule followed by Tampa and blatantly violated by Colorado.


I haven’t seen that angle yet, but regardless, the goal shouldn’t have counted. We can all agree on that, correct?

No

 

[Vancouver Canucks]

I kind of see this as the Brett Hull controversial moment. The goal by him in the 2001 Stanley Cup Finals was allowed, because the goal was in, whether his foot was in the crease or not.

It's simple. Kadri would've scored that goal, whether the sixth men near the boards was in or out.

 

[wayninja]

I heard no penalty was called because Colorado put those extra players on LTIR.

 

[Freudian]

Wait. People are actually discussing this as if it's a thing and not just Cooper being a sore loser?

 

[Antiramie]

Colorado has had their fare share of shit calls against us. We moved on from them. You should too. Winning teams get passed them. Just like Tampa the last few years. You get some breaks, you lose some breaks. No sense in crying about it.

The fewer shit calls in sports the better...no matter who is benefitting from them.

 

[wayninja]

Wait. People are actually discussing this as if it's a thing and not just Cooper being a sore loser?

There's several zapruder films at this point.

 

[SillyRabbit]

On Sportsnet they showed that it wasn't the issue with the Avs having too many men but rather Kadri making an early change. That argument makes way more sense.

The MacKinnon still being on the ice thing is a different issue that isn't really related to the goal.

It's Kadri flying onto the ice too early and taking the pass in stride right off the bench.

 

[The Merchant]

The fewer shit calls in sports the better...no matter who is benefitting from them.

Bet you had this same exact sentiment against the Isles, right?

 

[Antiramie]

Bet you had this same exact sentiment against the Isles, right?

Did I stutter?

 

[wayninja]

Focusing on a missed call that should have been a PP instead of an opponent GWG in sudden death OT = fussing

Shots were 11-3 in OT. One team wanted it, the other is fussing about missed calls.

 

[SimpleJack]

He speaks as if the Avs didn’t absolutely dominate the OT and without question rightfully earn the W…

 

[Hasbro]

Yes because there is a rule about that. A rule followed by Tampa and blatantly violated by Colorado.


I haven’t seen that angle yet, but regardless, the goal shouldn’t have counted. We can all agree on that, correct?

The bargaining phase of the Kubler-Ross Model.

 

[Mikeshane]

Finally found the angle they showed on TV.

 

[Meuracas]

Shots were 11-3 in OT. One team wanted it, the other is fussing about missed calls.

As a Bolts fan, I unfortunately have to agree…

 

[Antiramie]

Shots were 11-3 in OT. One team wanted it, the other is fussing about missed calls.

Show me where in the rulebook it says "A penalty will be called for _____ infraction (unless it's deemed the team committing the violation wants it more".

I'll wait.

 

[wayninja]

Show me where in the rulebook it says "____ penalty will be called for _____ infraction (unless it's deemed they want it more".

I'll wait.