zharkenby
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2011
- 3,178
- 1,047
So sevo sucks
Hynes sucks
Goaltending a problem
I thought this year would be different
Hynes sucks
Goaltending a problem
I thought this year would be different
Because it's the only game that's counted so far this year and people don't realize just how bad a spot he got put into. It's one thing to replace a goalie who wasn't doing well, the backup can usually see which way the game is going and start to mentally prepare to go in, plus there's little pressure coming in when you're trailing anyway. When your lead's just got melted from 4 to 2 and you're thrown into that high pressure situation cold? And in your first real game of the season no less? Different story.
Putting a player like Hayden up on the 2nd line when that line already scored a goal and you're winning the game 4-1 would be worthy of immediately dismissing the coach all by itself. It's completely nonsensical and there is no explanation that could possibly justify it.
The guy is a ****ing hack.
They clear the puck once or twice and they win.
That or score because they absolutely had long offensive shifts that didn’t result in a goal. Hall’s line in particular. He or Palms needed to find goal 5 to kills the Jets momentum
Lol going to buffalo tomorrow. Wish me luck.
Puck hopped over Nicos stick with an empty net, Wood hit the crossbar. Easily could have been a win. They weren’t outplayed at all, the mental mistakes can be fixed.
Its not every day your starting goalie gets hurt. Shit happens, this wasnt a bad performance outside of Severson. Move on to Buffalo.I mean this will always happen. What can't hapoen is blow a 4-0 lead
Its not every day your starting goalie gets hurt. **** happens, this wasnt a bad performance outside of Severson. Move on to Buffalo.
God, I would love to see some of you people go back and analyze some of the moves your favorite coaches made. Your heads would explode.
Gusev-Hughes-Bratt is not going to be a good line defensively. You've got two guys playing on their off-wing and an 18 year old. The plan was almost certainly to switch these lines late in games. Sometimes plans don't work out.
I actually thought the third goal on Blackwood was one that was stoppable, at least that was my first thought. I need to watch it again one more time. Out of all 4 goals that were scored tonight, that was the only one I'd count as stoppable. The rebound on goal 2 wasn't a good one, but Severson should have been more alert and he could have cleared that.It was a really tough spot. 100% we don’t lose this game if Cory’s hip doesn’t explode.
Blackwood was not at all settled in and it’s obvious why. They needed to be tighter defensively because it was clear he was fighting it.
Goal 3 was not a good one though. We needed a save there.
I actually thought the third goal on Blackwood was one that was stoppable, at least that was my first thought. I need to watch it again one more time. Out of all 4 goals that were scored tonight, that was the only one I'd count as stoppable. The rebound on goal 2 wasn't a good one, but Severson should have been more alert and he could have cleared that.
Yup. That's the one I thought too.We are talking about the same goal. It was the Jet’s third goal. First one on Blackwood.
The solution is not to have a fourth-liner who isn't that good defensively either piggybacking with them. I'd rather have a bad defensive line try to score another goal than fubar the lines to play prevent defense.
This is nonsense. Hayden is not some proven vet with defensive prowess that could be used to justify putting him on the second line to protect a lead or something. You think Hayden being added to that line adds enough defensively to offset the offense and puck possession that will probably be lost as a result? Not to mention that it requires at least one other line to be altered in a game where the team is playing well and leading by a significant amount.God, I would love to see some of you people go back and analyze some of the moves your favorite coaches made. Your heads would explode.
Gusev-Hughes-Bratt is not going to be a good line defensively. You've got two guys playing on their off-wing and an 18 year old. The plan was almost certainly to switch these lines late in games. Sometimes plans don't work out.
Who is to blame for tonight's loss? I want to say Hynes but is that the easy out?
This is nonsense. Hayden is not some proven vet with defensive prowess that could be used to justify putting him on the second line to protect a lead or something. You think Hayden being added to that line adds enough defensively to offset the offense and puck possession that will probably be lost as a result? Not to mention that it requires at least one other line to be altered in a game where the team is playing well and leading by a significant amount.
It wasn't necessary, and you can't justify it. Amateur coach makes dumbass amateur decisions...add it to the list that has grown over the years.
Do you really believe deep down this guy can lead a team to a Stanley Cup? Be honest.
Cory’s hip? Hynes didn’t coach a good game. Severson was an absolute disaster.
Probably all of the above .. Blackwood didn't look good either.