I don’t know. I watched part of the game and looked through the fancy stats. Maybe I have Pulju-colored glasses on but I didn’t get this doom and gloom from it that seems to be the new narrative. A 20 year old player didn’t look good against the best team in NHL. Not really that unique of an experience for those circumstances. If he scores another goal by the 8th game he’d still be going at a 20 goal pace. I see the major arguments against JP are the ”misadventures” and ”eye test,” both of which are very convenient definitions in that they can be applied to whatever narrative anyone wants to argue at a given day. Could someone quantify the exact amount and flavor of misadventures JP has had and how they correspond to Yakupov’s misadventures? Or is it just something that can be randomly thrown out as negative feedback without anyone really being sure what they mean?
For this season the sample size up to now is miniscule, and him playing on the 2nd line is a fraction of that. I’d give him 20 games on Drai’s wing, but of course with McLellan’s line blender blasting full steam this is not in the realm of realistic options. I get the idea that he needs to score a million goals right now because otherwise McLellan will never give him more than 8 minutes of ice per game, but that is the coach being the problem and not the player. The coach is reactionary, the team is reactionary, and the fans are slowly conditioned to be just as reactionary.
Theres typically way too much amplitude reaction on a fanboard. I get it. people are emotional about something they are passionate about. But the ups and downs one see's here are so extreme.
If Pulju scored on one of his great chances last night none of these comments are happening.
That said I audibly groaned when he took a very poor shot on the PP and missed the net by a lot and with the heavy shot of course careening all the way back down the ice. you see things like that and it makes your head hurt.
I don't know what it is. In Canadian hockey if I do something like that I have a coach and a dozen players telling me not to do that on the PP. Not to ever do that. This is far from the first time.
A couple things sadden me. The shot was bizarre. The mechanics off. That shot didn't have a chance of hitting net. It wasn't even a good shot decision. It was a complete brainfart, which is fair, the kid is still a kid. Pulju is seemingly younger than chronologic age, he's young anyway.