Any " effectiveness " rating system that has an AHL/NHL tweener rated higher than a guy putting up another Hart Trophy worthy season should probably best stay in the workshop.
I’ve noticed that he shouldn’t be considered as 30% more effective than a top-five Hart Trophy candidate.have you noticed that this is not just another guy? maybe you've noticed that I generate overall in-season player effectiveness ratings. when I do that, guys with low minutes get asterisks to denote their likely outlying status. Jesse's star marking has been removed, so I am posting this update in the dude's player discussion thread:
MAR 80 - COY 86 - PAS 91
van 85 - ZAC 81 - DeB 97
FRE 92 - POI 84 - GEE 86
HEI 97 - BOQ 125 - LAU 57
GRZ 81 - McA 91
LIN 88 - CAR 100
FOR 104 - SHA 62
SWA 92
ULL 86
MER 101* - STE 67 - BRO 56* - BEE 55 - LUC 49*
MIT 101 - WOT 83 - LOH 61
BUS *
Naturally had a really bad back check last night because I made this post but he did also make a nifty pass to set up a goalHe played Well- he set up one of mcavoys goals. He’s a really dedicated backchecker. I kind of like his game. Took him a few to get going- he looked like AHL fodder at that point- but the last few he’s playing like a guy who may end up winning a spot in the lineup
Do you custom edit guys in nhl 24 to these stats?have you noticed that this is not just another guy? maybe you've noticed that I generate overall in-season player effectiveness ratings. when I do that, guys with low minutes get asterisks to denote their likely outlying status. Jesse's star marking has been removed, so I am posting this update in the dude's player discussion thread:
MAR 80 - COY 86 - PAS 91
van 85 - ZAC 81 - DeB 97
FRE 92 - POI 84 - GEE 86
HEI 97 - BOQ 125 - LAU 57
GRZ 81 - McA 91
LIN 88 - CAR 100
FOR 104 - SHA 62
SWA 92
ULL 86
MER 101* - STE 67 - BRO 56* - BEE 55 - LUC 49*
MIT 101 - WOT 83 - LOH 61
BUS *
Not meaning at all to be a prick, but doesn't an effectiveness rating that shows Boqvist as being better than guys like Pasta and Marchand make you pause and consider that maybe you need to make some changes to the model? Like you don't even need analytics of any sort to tell you Pastrnak brings more to the team than Boqvist and Heinenhave you noticed that this is not just another guy? maybe you've noticed that I generate overall in-season player effectiveness ratings. when I do that, guys with low minutes get asterisks to denote their likely outlying status. Jesse's star marking has been removed, so I am posting this update in the dude's player discussion thread:
MAR 80 - COY 86 - PAS 91
van 85 - ZAC 81 - DeB 97
FRE 92 - POI 84 - GEE 86
HEI 97 - BOQ 125 - LAU 57
GRZ 81 - McA 91
LIN 88 - CAR 100
FOR 104 - SHA 62
SWA 92
ULL 86
MER 101* - STE 67 - BRO 56* - BEE 55 - LUC 49*
MIT 101 - WOT 83 - LOH 61
BUS *
Genuine question: when you watch a game do you see Boqvist as better than Pasta or Forbort as the best Dman?here's that update you wanted for the break:
MAR 86 - COY 92 - FRE 100
van 87 - ZAC 88 - PAS 96
BOQ 114 - GEE 90 - HEI 94
LAU 59 - BRO 34* - STE 66
HRZ 82 - McA 95
LIN 94 - CAR 105
WOT 80 - SHA 63
SWA 92
ULL 87
MER 98* - DeB 93 - POI 82 - BEE 54 - LUC 47*
FOR 107 - MIT 101 - LOH 61
BUS *
Agree on all points. He skates very well. I think he busts his ass at games. Nice to see him score.thought that was boqvist's best game as a bruin today. i don't know if he's capable of bringing this level consistently, but
the guy today is a legit good hockey player and brings speed that we lack.
All the new guys looked good today. Brazzeau looked good and was always in position even though it was reported, he couldn't skate. Richards and Boquist can really motor. And they all threw a couple of hits.He's more experienced than Beecher and it shows when comparing their overall play but Beecher is the superior faceoff guy. I wonder if having the two together on the 4th line would work. Bo certainly skates hard, and while not a huge guy, knows a 4th liners roll has to lean towards having a grindy, physical mentality and he hasn't shied away from that part.
Sweeney must be good at goodwill shopping.At 750k what a bargain.
Anton Blidhjust when I`m tired of watching Boqvist, he plays a game like yesterday. Still wish we had some nasty on that 4th line but also understand, not a ton of those type of players around these days
Few expected much when they were acquired but the Bruins look like they found very good bottom 6 centers in Geekie and Boqvist.he's starting to look like that marcus johansson clone i thought i saw in NJ at times
In our preseason predictions thread, that's the role I had him playing. Stapled to Coyle's wing. My opinion of him is still in recovery after his start to the year and indifference in Providence.he's starting to look like that marcus johansson clone i thought i saw in NJ at times
Is there a Top 9 forward there? He's always had skill and good feet.
I'd still like someone bigger, better defensively and better on face-offs centering my 4th line.
Him and Geekie have sneaky talent
Gotta wonder if he could perhaps give them more than what Jake has been giving them for production if given that roleIs there a Top 9 forward there? He's always had skill and good feet.
I'd still like someone bigger, better defensively and better on face-offs centering my 4th line.
Gotta wonder if he could perhaps give them more than what Jake has been giving them for production if given that role