Thats on 7 year deal. Here people are advocating for 8x9. Big difference.
Thats on 7 year deal. Here people are advocating for 8x9. Big difference.
6 * 10.5 or 8 * 8. Which would you prefer?
BTW the 2nd rounder we gave up for Jeff will be either 5 or 6 picks below the 1st round pick we got in THAT trade. If he goes we gave that up for a year rental that was totally worthless. What more needs to be said?
Whatever it takes to keep him. We have 2 options:So, what's the most you would pay Skinner?
Whatever it takes to keep him. We have 2 options:
1) Overpay him by $1.5 million a year (enough to pay for a 4th liner) so the team at least has a prayer of being competitive.
Or
2) Let him walk and watch this team get it's head kicked in on a nightly basis for the next 2 seasons with guys like Olofson, Mitts and Tage being thrown into positions where they are being counted on that they are in no way ready for and totaling their careers before they even begin.
So, what's the most you would pay Skinner?
Who are you getting, and name names. The only way we even end up with ONE 20-25 goal scorer is if we offer a massive overpay because there are literally 30 better options for NHL players to choose than us. So we will use most of that and end up with a far inferior player.The roster, as is right now, isn’t a Jeff skinner away from being a playoff team. Sure he could be part of the solution but he isn’t THE solution.
If skinner walks we are still going to spend that money. I still will argue 2 20-25 goal scorers added at 9M total will do more good than one 35 goal scorer at 9M.
Names, please.The roster, as is right now, isn’t a Jeff skinner away from being a playoff team. Sure he could be part of the solution but he isn’t THE solution.
If skinner walks we are still going to spend that money. I still will argue 2 20-25 goal scorers added at 9M total will do more good than one 35 goal scorer at 9M.