This year Jack's rocking an ATOI of 16:02. Hall's was 18:13 his rookie year, Stammer's was 14:56 and Mackinnon packed a 17:21. Not really an accurate explanation except for Stammer.
It's highly misleading to talk about points after the first 24 games and then take TOI for the entire season. Stamkos was a PPG player by the end of the season once he got the ice time.
Total bust!
Is he not the smallest 1st overall pick in almost forever? Kid will be fine once he gets bigger and stronger.
Give me a break. He isn't 65 lbs.
Do you have a source for TOI in the first 24 games of those seasons?
Just for reference... anyone know historically what the best rookie seasons for an 18 year old out of the usntdp are?
He's physically under developed. I'd be much more concerned if he were 6' 3" and 220lbs. and struggling. Give him a year or two to fill out and get stronger and he'll be fine.
None of those guys meet the criteria because they either played in the OHL, NCAA, or Swiss league before making the NHL not the USNTDP/USHL.
Problems with points:
1. Purely offensive metric, which can miss a fair bit. In Jack's case, it misses his fairly solid defense and excellent penalty differential, which have given him 2.4 Goals above average (he's +8 on penalties for the year in just 24 games, that's really good, tied for 10th in the league!)
2. Very luck-dependant. Jack's underperformed his expected fenwick shooting% by about 2.3 percentage points, good for about an extra goal if he shoots at a league average number (his individual expected goals is a little over 5, too). More notably, his team's scoring 0.7 fewer goals than expected goals with him on the ice at 5v5, which is not helping his assist numbers. He also only has 2 secondary assists on the season (10th on the devils, tied for 312th in the league). It's been long determined that secondary assists are mostly luck, especially for forwards. If his secondary assists and primary assists were equal and he had that extra goal, he'd be rocking a respectable 15 points, tied with MacKinnon and ahead of Stammer and Hall. The only difference is crappy luck.
3. Very usage-dependent. This one doesn't super apply to Jack, but it is worth noting that some of the biggest factors in point totals are powerplay time, overall icetime, and quality of teammates, none of which a player can control. Jack's seen some decent usage so it's not a big factor dropping his point totals, but it is worth noting.
Hughes hasn't been great, but he's not been terrible either. There's a solid argument that his rookie year's been better than Stammer, JT or Hall, and they all turned out just fine.
They all meet the criteria. You're just changing the criteria. lol
Imagine if his nightmare didn’t become a reality and if the Avs didn’t get screwed in the lottery again.
Hughes next to MacKinnon/Rantanen or Kadri/Landeskog.
Poor kid.
I'm sure we can count on the same kind of development happening.Former 1st overall pick, Joe Thornton - who is 14th all-time in career points - had just 7 points in 55 games as a rookie
Just for reference... anyone know historically what the best rookie seasons for an 18 year old out of the usntdp are?
Criteria was 18 year old nhl rookie, making the jump straight from the usntdp to the nhl.
Criteria was 18 year old nhl rookie, making the jump straight from the usntdp to the nhl.