I'll look at the first 24 games since that's how many Hughes has played. I'll also ignore Dmen.
2005 - Crosby - 12g, 28p
2007 - Kane - 7g, 25p
2008 - Stamkos - 3g, 11p
2009 - Tavares - 9g, 19p
2010 - Hall - 6g, 12p
2011 - RNH - 10g, 25p
2012 - Yakupov - 6g, 12p
2013 - MacKinnon - 4g, 15p
2015 - McDavid - 10g, 28p
2016 - Matthews - 11g, 19p
2017 - Hischier - 5g, 18p
2019 - Hughes - 4g, 11p
Problems with points:
1. Purely offensive metric, which can miss a fair bit. In Jack's case, it misses his fairly solid defense and excellent penalty differential, which have given him 2.4 Goals above average (he's +8 on penalties for the year in just 24 games, that's really good, tied for 10th in the league!)
2. Very luck-dependant. Jack's underperformed his expected fenwick shooting% by about 2.3 percentage points, good for about an extra goal if he shoots at a league average number (his individual expected goals is a little over 5, too). More notably, his team's scoring 0.7 fewer goals than expected goals with him on the ice at 5v5, which is not helping his assist numbers. He also only has 2 secondary assists on the season (10th on the devils, tied for 312th in the league). It's been long determined that secondary assists are mostly luck, especially for forwards. If his secondary assists and primary assists were equal and he had that extra goal, he'd be rocking a respectable 15 points, tied with MacKinnon and ahead of Stammer and Hall. The only difference is crappy luck.
3. Very usage-dependent. This one doesn't super apply to Jack, but it is worth noting that some of the biggest factors in point totals are powerplay time, overall icetime, and quality of teammates, none of which a player can control. Jack's seen some decent usage so it's not a big factor dropping his point totals, but it is worth noting.
Hughes hasn't been great, but he's not been terrible either. There's a solid argument that his rookie year's been better than Stammer, JT or Hall, and they all turned out just fine.