LOGiK
Registered User
- Nov 14, 2007
- 18,319
- 9,042
@BlindWillyMcHurtI'm pretty sure that's what I'm implying for all goalies.
Don't get all booboo faced.
Ya man. Don't be all Blind Willy Mc Butt Hurt.
hue hue heuee
@BlindWillyMcHurtI'm pretty sure that's what I'm implying for all goalies.
Don't get all booboo faced.
The answer is in my post you quoted.Lundqvist has won 2 of the 4 playoff series he played against us?
For how many times the Pens wrecked him, he responded twice back.
For me the problem was always that he has very poor agility for an NHL goalie/starter. His weak glove stems from this too because it's not enough to know that the player wants to shoot glove side, you still have to track the height properly and react.
He's brilliant at positioning and predicting movements when he's on his game. That's why he's had success.
So if he's not insulated and players getting open looks in tight, he sucks at making adjustments to make those difficult ones, especially if a forward gets creative. Just too slow. We saw it in the Blues game.
This is in stark contrast to our other 2 goalies. DeSmith especially is insanely agile.
Only meant relative to other goalies. He's still an athlete."very poor agility" is a stretch but generally understand the point.
So then why commit term or money to goalies?
For me the problem was always that he has very poor agility for an NHL goalie/starter. His weak glove stems from this too because it's not enough to know that the player wants to shoot glove side, you still have to track the height properly and react.
He's brilliant at positioning and predicting movements when he's on his game. That's why he's had success.
So if he's not insulated and players getting open looks in tight, he sucks at making adjustments to make those difficult ones, especially if a forward gets creative. Just too slow. We saw it in the Blues game.
This is in stark contrast to our other 2 goalies. DeSmith especially is insanely agile.
At what point does Murray effectively become the backup? Personally, I'd platoon them through December and then decide whom to ride through the spring after the first of the year.
So Murray has to go side to side like very few goalies in the league. Good teams don't let their goalies move that much.
I see a defense that gives up way too many shots from prime scoring areas. The Pens never really replaced Cole as a shot blocker and Sullivan's over hyper, over aggressive style has been figured out.
So Murray has to go side to side like very few goalies in the league. Good teams don't let their goalies move that much.
Some goals are on him but every goalie lets in bad goals.
Does a heat map show where the pass comes from so the goalie has to extend and open himself up?The last heat map I saw showed us more or less being great at preventing high danger stuff, with all the higher danger stuff we do allow coming from the goalie's right. Hockey reference has us way ahead of the league in higher danger attempts allowed (but not high danger goals against) which to me speaks more to Murray's performance than team defense.
I watch enough hockey at every level.
Good teams dont let their goalies go side to side. They play strong within the middle of the ice and there isn't a free for all in the slot. Ive seen enough of two D in one corner to last me a life time.
I see a defense that gives up way too many shots from prime scoring areas. The Pens never really replaced Cole as a shot blocker and Sullivan's over hyper, over aggressive style has been figured out.
I see a defense that gives up way too many shots from prime scoring areas. The Pens never really replaced Cole as a shot blocker and Sullivan's over hyper, over aggressive style has been figured out.
So Murray has to go side to side like very few goalies in the league. Good teams don't let their goalies move that much.
Some goals are on him but every goalie lets in bad goals.