No matter the cost Dubas gets a free pass on that?
Maybe you didn’t really mean what you said.
I feel like an idiot, when I reply you, but when you're bailing about Patrick Marleau trade over and over and over again. I do this.
You sure understand that in cap league (like NHL) it was borderline miracle. That we get one potential contender to pay 4,25 million real dollars and to eat up 6,25 million dollars of used cap space for only 1st round draft pick from another potential playoff team in same conference.
I assume that we both can agree, that if there was BETTER trade available for Kyle Dubas. Kyle Dubas is competent enough of doing that better trade rather than trading away our 1st rounder.
We can't see that alternate future where our cap space would have been eaten by Patrick Marleau, that wanted to PLAY ONLY at Toronto or San Jose or wanted to be BOUGHT OUT.
When we made that trade BUYOUT window was closing and after that we had ONE team that we could have traded Patrick Marleau to:
SAN JOSE SHARKS. That DIDN'T have available cap space for Marleau.
So we can't see alternate future, but at last summer we do as a FACT, that we didn't have enough off-season cap space for Patrick Marleau, Andreas Johnson, Kasperi Kapanen and Mitch Marner. So if Kyle Dubas f***S UP that trade, there is real threat of offer sheets coming and he would have been behind eight ball (trades in real tricky window). Offer sheets for Kapanen or Johnson rather than Marner. Compensation would have been less than 1st rounder.
If I get a chance to choose between Kasperi Kapanen, Andreas Johnson or 1st rounder. I choose those players every time, BECAUSE if we get to pick player that good in mid to late 1st round. It would be very good.
If I have to choose if at start of the season with Kapanen & Johnson or keep our 1st rounder. I take those players every time, because we would be very lucky to draft that kind of talent with that pick.
That trade was unnecessary evil to build our roster for this season. Patrick Marleau was dead weight for us and would have prevented us from playing too competent players instead of him. Boston Bruins is in same situation with David Backes that they want to get rid of.
Lou signed Patrick Marleau to bad contract that we could nothing about during summer 2019. Either way with Marleau we would have been screwed. We cannot force ironman streak Marleau to LTIR, we cannot bury him (since we signed him and only 1mil cap relief), we can't buy him out and every other team (than San Jose Sharks) that acquires him has to buy him out.
To get 6,25mil dead cap space for 4,25 million of real dollars. What luxury.
I think it was miracle that Carolina agreed to that trade. I'm not happy about it, but in best case scenario if we advance in playoffs pick is +20. Big part of our summer was that trade, so we could really build our roster the way it is built.
Would you rather have Andreas Johnson & Kasperi Kapanen or Patrick Marleau & Trevor Moore / Mason Marchment / Kenny Agostino / etc. Marlie player.
I know who I pick and when you say that we could have traded them for some value. You have to remember that in that case (we kept Marleau), we are the team in weak spot to be exploited. In real life we still have those players and can use them later on in trades (from better position).
If you want to argue with me show me a real case in NHL that has been at least in the same ball park, where player was acquired to be bought out for lesser reward.
And if you're going to babble about how "Lou would have done it, because of Dion Phaneuf". Check your facts first. There we lost real dollars (that matter for Melnyk) and Ottawa thought that Phaneuf still had something left in him. Different situation, but great trade for us and Lou.