7even
Offered and lost
For real though, Kapanen for Severson?
Really prefer to use that bullet for a defenseman who can defend.
For real though, Kapanen for Severson?
Laughton + Myers
For
Kappy + Harpur
I just heard that Philly was one of the interested teams..Why would the Flyers trade Myers
TSN Radio just now. Lebrun says teams love Kappy and he would fetch Dumba straight up if the Leafs wanted to.RIP to all those fans who thought they would get Kapanen for DeSmith or Georgiev
RIP to all those fans who thought they would get Kapanen for DeSmith or Georgiev
RIP to all those fans who thought they would get Kapanen for DeSmith or Georgiev
Mayfield is interesting..Off the top of my head...Connor Murphy in Chicago. Scott Mayfield in NYI. Travis Hamonic in Calgary. Anthony DeAngelo in NYR. Different situations, different values, different trades.
No, the deal wouldn't be done by now. A 1 for 1 can't be done, even if both teams are willing.TSN Radio just now. Lebrun says teams love Kappy and he would fetch Dumba straight up if the Leafs wanted to.
Don't you think that if Dumbass could have gotten Dumba straight up for Kappy it would have been done by now?
Lebrun is making a fool of himself by making such a ridiculous claim.
Lol, really, leafs fans are so funny, so leafs got the best PP ever lol, So leafs had the best ever C depth in nhl history nope, mathews on the same level as mcdavid, leafs winning multiple cups with this team.
So what where you saying about missing horribly, just an fyi leafs fan should not atatck anybody else team, you know havent won anything in forver, not passed the 1st round in forever.
Dubas is looking for term and an age appropriate player.With term you say? Sounds like they would love Burns or Karlsson. They have lots of term. Don't worry about the cap, we can make it work.
What?
Is the world just binary opposites to you?
Currently we have a top tier PP unit and two elite Cs down the middle. What part of that is false. I challenge you to find a single post where a fan claimed the Leafs had the best C depth in history.
We are what we are, a super offensively gifted and deep team trying to find some defensive balance.
Kapanen is on pace to score 46 points over 82 on the highest-scoring team in the league.
Gets to play with Marner/Tavares/Matthews/Nylander.
Canucks comparables to Kapanen would be Virtanen and Gaudette. I don't see how those guys land a top 4 RHD under 26 with term. There would have to be an add.
Karlsson is a measly 29, and Burns will be 35, 2 years younger than mr. marleau when you guys signed him. That sounds age appropriate to meDubas is looking for term and an age appropriate player.
If you want to use Marleau as a template, you should call the Islanders about those guys, Lou works there now.Karlsson is a measly 29, and Burns will be 35, 2 years younger than mr. marleau when you guys signed him. That sounds age appropriate to me
Those would be excellent comparables if they were actually comparable. Except both score at about half the rate of Kapanen at the same age and are probably in a lower skill bracket as well.
Dumbass doesn't have Kappy to trade. Dumbass is the Habs GM.TSN Radio just now. Lebrun says teams love Kappy and he would fetch Dumba straight up if the Leafs wanted to.
Don't you think that if Dumbass could have gotten Dumba straight up for Kappy it would have been done by now?
Lebrun is making a fool of himself by making such a ridiculous claim.
If only a half season made a careerTIL 31 in 54 and 23 in 44 are half the pace of 29 in 52
If only a half season made a career
One player has 90 points in 264 games the only has 83 points in 185 games.
I'd take burns or karlson in a heartbeatWith term you say? Sounds like they would love Burns or Karlsson. They have lots of term. Don't worry about the cap, we can make it work.
No way to fit either contract, and Burns is 35.I'd take burns or karlson in a heartbeat
Lol Karlsson on the leafs. Instead of every win being 6-5 it’d have to be 11-10I'd take burns or karlson in a heartbeat
I am looking at the full five year career of two similar aged players and you are looking at the most recent ~50 games, and you are trying to infer that I am cherry picking stats?So you only want to look at it in the way that makes your guy look favorable?
I am looking at the full five year career of two similar aged players and you are looking at the most recent ~50 games, and you are trying to infer that I am cherry picking stats?