I mean, it depends. Is the alternative a combination of Condon and McKenna, because if so I suspect we'd have 1 or 2 wins without Anderson.
The team has shown the ability to score, but is porous defensively. Anderson has done what you want a starter to do, keep us in games. He's had some off nights where you could argue with a better performance we'd have won, but that happens with every goalie, our issue is that we typically aren't good enough defensively to win games where he has an off night, because if he's off, there's 6 goals in our net.