Mr. Make-Believe
The happy genius of my household
I would argue we can't afford to pass up any opportunity to get a top pairing d-man like Shattenkirk. I'd expose multiple holes on the wing to fill the gaping one on D.
I understand what you're saying, but I gotta think there are better options (well, not better players than Shattenkirk, but) that don't include robbing Peter to pay Paul so to speak.
Would rather deal for a minute-muncher than a true #2 if it meant not killing the forward crew. And yes, I think moving Eriksson would kill a very delicate balance for the Bruins up front.