MS
1%er
Hoglander played 21:45, which was the 2nd most amongst forwards. My view is the opposite - had a couple of bad moments, but overall was one of the better players tonight.
He had a lot of time on the PP, so obviously the coaches like his offensive ability.
I wonder if Hog would be a better option on the left side on the 1st unit. Boeser has a good shot, but is very predictable because he just kind of stands there, and a lot of times he gives up the puck. Hoglander is super shifty and mobile and would probly find a lot more passing lanes open up, or opportunities to stickhandle right to the net for a scoring chance.
I'm not criticizing Hoglander at all. He wasn't 'bad' tonight per se and has done exceptionally well to get to this point. And was terrific yesterday.
But in the longer term and the bigger picture ... having a 20 y/o rookie on what should be a high-leverage matchup line is not going to work out well. And things like what happened in the 3rd period tonight are bound to happen. The kid was getting sheltered minutes in Sweden because he wasn't trusted defensively at that level and is now getting thrown out against the McDavids of the world.
The fact that we don't have a proper 3rd/defensive line means Horvat has to carry that mantle and it just really isn't the place to break in a one-dimensional skilled rookie winger.
McDavid had a field day tonight because there was no line nor any defensive pairing that could be competently expected to match up against him. Every line had a weak link, every defensive pairing had a weak link. If the team can't sort this out, it will be a long season.