No, that's Hunwick
This deal is still awful
But Hunwick is the worst player in the NHL.by far
As someone who has seen both players play for the Rangers, no he isn't.
There is no way he can be any worse than Polak or Hunwik. He's playing a contending teams top pair, he can't be as bad as advertised. I feel like he gets unfairly hated on here.
No, that's Hunwick
This deal is still awful
But Hunwick is the worst player in the NHL.by far
When was the last time you watched Hunwick? he's gotten worse
I think this might be something. There's also this guy who spent a short period of time in Toronto that I don't think got a fair shake. Think his name was Clarkson. Let's send Kapanen and a 2nd to reacquire him. Then I think we should send our 1st this year to LA to acquire some leadership in Brown.
He's exactly what the Leafs need. Vet, experience, can play the top pair and help shut down teams.
Proposal:
Rangers:
Bracco
Conditional 2018 2nd rounder based on the Leafs making the playoffs in the 2017-2018 season
Michalek for cap reasons (Expires after this year)
Leafs:
Girardi 30% retained (~ 4m AAV)
Girardi is the worst defensemen in the NHL
worst? eh.... id say hunwick has him beat.
I watch both play. It's clearly Girard. Leafs fans think their players are either the nhl best or the nhl worst.
Straightdramaqueening
In a normal year I wouldn't make that trade but with the expansion draft looming and Girardi having an NMC you would have to include at least Buch in any deal to get me to take him.
That is too much, esp considering after the exp draft you can buy him out or let him sit on the bench for most games for a year, then the cap hit gets small.
No Buch
no top shelf blue chips
decent value on future picks and a mid prospect or two sweetener.
These guys don't attach to the cap until they are with your big club, so
Lupul
for
Girardi
the extra 3rd rounders
and
in addition to Tambellini
Kovacs and Stromwall
that is the final offer
Some people just need to talk less and learn more... Watch some other team's games or at least listen to what their fans are saying.
Girardi is absolutely worse than Polak or Hunwick. "Why?" you may ask? While he may be the same skill level or marginally better (I don't know. I don't watch the Leafs or Rangers very much to know for sure) than Polak or Hunwick, the two Leafs' defensemen's contracts at least expire this year and are relatively cheap. Girardi's, on the other hand, goes for 3 more years at $5.5 million per year! That's insane for a barely NHL Dman.
In no way do you want any part of Girardi. Just be patient with your team. Don't feel the need to trade away valuable future assets for a couple more meaningless wins this year.
Girardi has NEGATIVE value.
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?p=125689023#post125689023....I find it extremely hard to analyze individual players. I can notice how teams play, but the game just moves way too fast for me to be able to develop any kind of analysis of any particular player. How do you guys do it?
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?p=125689023#post125689023
You guys jump on the bandwagon much? You almost can't even make this up....gotta love talking in absolutes when you've got no idea what you're talking about.
Yup, Girardi sucks....why? Because a jackass of a sports writer slams the Blueliners defense after an early exit last season. You know Staal has negative value too for the same reason.
Injuries don't matter.....play through injuries, have a down season and you suck...just ask Rick Nash who played hurt last season or Kevin Klein who's had back issues this season. Injuries didn't stop anyone from jumping on their respective "he sucks" bandwagons. Amid these three terrible blueliners, the Rangers manage to keep the puck out of their net, better than most teams...it must be because of their Hall of Fame goaltender standing on his head all the time. Though if that were the case, how's his hair looking so good while he's sitting on the bench?
If you're going to be a follower, at least know who you're following. Larry Brooks is a PoS, writing for a rag of a paper. They're just like any other trashy tabloid and will print any garbage that gets attention.
Absolutely no in every way i can possibly say it.