Mikah
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2018
- 175
- 188
Yeah we get it but why would I refuse to acquire a potential cornerstone of the next 10 years because of 7 missed games.
That's the problem though. Not just this year, but for the coming years.
Having KK + Suzuki for cheap means they can possibly sign Danault. So even though they don't have a superstar, they still have 3 solid centers for a few years. If they trade one of KK or Suzuki for PLD, then they can no longer sign Danault. So even though they would improve the top line, they end up eventually with Evans and Poehling as 3rd and 4th center because Danault would not be extended, and they are stuck for years with the lack of depth at center.
Which is better?
This is why the only way this works is if you trade Danault and package (Guhle + 1st round pick + salary dump?) for PLD. And it is a very delicate situation, because Danault is a lock with Gallagher and Tatar right now, so you may disturb the chemistry and morale. Plus, Danault is an option if Suzuki or KK are either injured or run out of gas, and his defensive/faceoff is really important right now.
So that's the problem. I would not do it for that return if I was Columbus, and I would not do it if I was Montreal. Plus, Montreal can be patient, whereas Columbus is stuck with a problem that will lose value over time.
A lot of journalists are making a lot of noise around this, but it is not going to happen with Montreal. A deal was possibly discussed before the start of the season, but obviously Bergevin did not go for it. If it did not work then, it makes less sense now.