Verviticus
Registered User
- Jul 23, 2010
- 12,664
- 592
how do you people not understand that objectively awful small decisions are a billion times worse than "maybe bad" impactful decisions
**** like sending corrado down or wasting small picks on garbage bags (like nonis) is a billion times worse than all the ballards and booths in the world
the funny thing is that biega is actually a really good, possibly-better-than-corrado AHL player that the comets desperately need right now
Utica needs Frankie right now, they're hurting with Markstrom being up.
Utica needs Frankie right now, they're hurting with Markstrom being up.
when you look at small bad decisions, they are not of high impact but they are very indicative of poor decision making. big bad outcomes like david booth (or lets say if vrbata wasnt awesome) can hurt more but they are at least signs that the person making the decision doesn't have some sort of disability. if vrbata was a trashcan or if clendenning doesnt turn out its like, ok guy it didnt work out, but it was good thinking with an unlucky execution
gillis made his share of stupid small moves too (every gm does it, without exception), see: cam barker - but they are far outweighed by the good ones. that i keep having to go back to vrbata should illustrate how many of those decisions i think benning has made. anyways if you wanna keep it up, reply to me in the benning thread and ill move there
honestly i think biega would help them more
this decision would make sense if frankie was out for three months with no dry land and they just wanted him to freshen up and also we didn't desperately need defence, but none of those are true. as it is, it just screaming "i dont know who frankie corrado is"
Exactly, the thing is that lots of really small bad moves will add up over time. The impact is felt cumulatively over time and it indicates something far worse going on upstairs.
That **** sneaks up on you when you overlook small little things like this.
Sending a 5/6 D-man down for like 2 or 3 games when he needs a conditioning stint anyway is the type of move that will add up and burn us later?
My mind is being blown right now.
when you look at small bad decisions, they are not of high impact but they are very indicative of poor decision making. big bad outcomes like david booth (or lets say if vrbata wasnt awesome) can hurt more but they are at least signs that the person making the decision doesn't have some sort of disability. if vrbata was a trashcan or if clendenning doesnt turn out its like, ok guy it didnt work out, but it was good thinking with an unlucky execution
gillis made his share of stupid small moves too (every gm does it, without exception), see: cam barker - but they are far outweighed by the good ones. that i keep having to go back to vrbata should illustrate how many of those decisions i think benning has made. anyways if you wanna keep it up, reply to me in the benning thread and ill move there
honestly i think biega would help them more
this decision would make sense if frankie was out for three months with no dry land and they just wanted him to freshen up and also we didn't desperately need defence, but none of those are true. as it is, it just screaming "i dont know who frankie corrado is"
eh, someone else would have to answer that, but id be surprised. guessing, i think corrado's got at least another full year of eligibility. this is the 2nd year of his ELC right?
Sending a 5/6 D-man down for like 2 or 3 games when he needs a conditioning stint anyway is the type of move that will add up and burn us later?
My mind is being blown right now.
I cant remember if we burned a year in 2013 or not when we played him against the Sharks in the playoffs.
Canucks Army tries to explain the weird tap-dance going on with AHL assignments: http://canucksarmy.com/2015/3/3/canucks-recall-frank-corrado-from-utica
I hope that Biega thing isn't true. It'd be a shame to waste one of the 4 call ups for nothing.
sounds like there was a rightful change of thinking regarding Frank Corrado and Biega.
It's the right move. You're talking prospect with upside with career AHLer.
lol what the hell? had to checkout what you were talking about. what a dumb error that'd be.
Here's what I think is going on with Corrado and Biega:
1. They papered Biega and not Corrado because they didn't actually intend to play Biega unless there was emergency. Biega was to be the extra D. They've done it all year - call up guys who just hang around the team in case one of them needs to go.
2. But it's playoff time now, both in the NHL and the AHL. Corrado is an important prospect and they'd prefer to be playing in the Calder Playoffs. Biega, a 27 year old AHLer, they're okay having up in the NHL to mostly warm the bench.
3. Tanev suffered a setback, so now they're in a situation where their spare D would have to play. They vastly prefer having Corrado play in this situation than Biega.
Thoughts?
which is sad because i didn't see career ahler with Biega. He was actually fairly solid.
Just awful, awful management he's going to the AHL while a career AHLer like Biega gets to stay up. Garbage.