trading Provorov for Marner makes Philly worse.. even if Marner is the better player.Not easy to acquire players like Marner. I get that the defense would be weakened, but Marner makes the team better—even at the cost of Provorov.
trading Provorov for Marner makes Philly worse.. even if Marner is the better player.Not easy to acquire players like Marner. I get that the defense would be weakened, but Marner makes the team better—even at the cost of Provorov.
Terrible. Huge add to Nylander to get ProvorovNylander for Provorov straight up works for me. If Toronto needs a forward back then it could be Lindblom, but hes not free. And as others have suggested we dont really want picks. That's where the trade gets messy.
Maybe:
Provorov + Lindblom
For
Nylander + Ceci
Terrible. Huge add to Nylander to get Provorov
This will be unsettled till a week before camp.
Moot point....that trade never happens from the Leafs end anyways.trading Provorov for Marner makes Philly worse.. even if Marner is the better player.
Provy had a bad to very bad year this past season and his metrics supported that.
Nylander did not produce well, but had great metrics.
Provy for Nylander - where do I sign
This is not true. I would take Marner’s 90+ points every day of the week and then bet on Sanheim taking a big step, Gostisbehere bouncing back, and Myers becoming a solid contributor sooner than later.trading Provorov for Marner makes Philly worse.. even if Marner is the better player.
Why is it absolute proof? Because it contradicts your opinion?This is absolute proof that these metrics are useless when used in this manner.
Don't really have needs.Let say that I would want to trade for his rights... What are the Flyers needs?
YikesDon't really have needs.
a young #1 DmanLet say that I would want to trade for his rights... What are the Flyers needs?
Yikes
Didn't you guys like, not even make the playoffs lol
Provorov for Laine
I could disagree with that.trading Provorov for Marner makes Philly worse.. even if Marner is the better player.
No.This might actually suit both teams needs no?
None, the Flyers are perfectly built and the odds-on cup favoriteHow about you tell me what our needs are then.
None, the Flyers are perfectly built and the odds-on cup favorite
Why is it absolute proof? Because it contradicts your opinion?
Provy had a bad to very bad year this past season and his metrics supported that.
Nylander did not produce well, but had great metrics.
Provy for Nylander - where do I sign
Yikes
Didn't you guys like, not even make the playoffs lol
No.
We don't "need" a RW since we have Voracek and Konecny who both produce as top 6 players. However trading Provy, means Hagg or Morin is in the top 6 D instead of Provy. That drop on D is way worse then the addition of what Laine would be.
Especially when on the prospect front, our next ready D would be Friedman...compared to Frost, Farabee, Rubstov, Vorobyev, etc... at F