TSN: : Flames and Canes talked about Lindholm trade. Could be part of a bigger deal.

[Wayne Primeau]

Nylander for Hamilton is comparable value

Nobody cares in this thread, which is about Calgary and Carolina.

 

[hurricure]

Since players usually only get traded once at a time, do you think it’s possible that there ARE conversations with multiple teams going on, and the writers only hear about a few of them, and then those happens to be the ones that don’t come true?

Yes I do... do I think Nik kypreos or Eliot Friedman are privy to the conversation...Nope!

 

[Potty John]

It makes more sense for Calgary to do a Brodie for Lindholm straight up deal, if not with a small add from Calgary.

 

[CraigsList]

It makes more sense to do a Brodie for Lindholm straight up deal, if not with a small add from Calgary.

Not for Carolina. Unless they move Hanifin or Faulk, they won't want Brodie.

 

[AKL]

It makes more sense to do a Brodie for Lindholm straight up deal, if not with a small add from Calgary.

Carolina has a fine defense. They need a 1C and a goalie. So no, it doesn’t make sense to do Brodie for Lindholm.

 

[AKL]

Yes I do... do I think Nik kypreos or Eliot Friedman are privy to the conversation...Nope!

Yeah but you’re not privy to what anyone is actually privy to or not, so if you have an issue with them sharing their opinions or ideas about these rumors, why are you sharing yours?

 

[hurricure]

Yeah but you’re not privy to what anyone is actually privy to or not, so if you have an issue with them sharing their opinions or ideas about these rumors, why are you sharing yours?

Right... I don’t sell my bs ideas on national TV... anyways, like I said I enjoy the rumor mill as well... just felt like pointing that out..I am entitled to my opinion, which I understand is all this is, as much as they are entitled to make things up...

 

[A91]

Dougie Hamilton routinely outscores Lindholm, so I wouldn't want to trade Hamilton for Lindholm. Seems like a bad trade to me. Like a reverse Hall for Larsson.

Pick 12, 43 and another 2nd for Hamonic tho

 

[CraigsList]

Pick 12, 43 and another 2nd for Hamonic tho

Pick 16 and 33 for G. Reinhart tho

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

Dougie, Gillies for Lindholm and Hanifin.

 

[GoldiFox]

Report doesn’t say Lindholm + Hanifin is the offer. Just that both pieces might be of interest. That would be a silly price to pay for Dougie Hamilton. Even if that were the cost, the Canes are one of the last teams that should be paying it.

I’d rather target Karlsson if the cost is Hanifin + Lindholm.

 

[A91]

Pick 16 and 33 for G. Reinhart tho

Reinhart was a #4 overall pick
16+33 = 49
4 = 4

Which one sounds better to you?

 

[Gargyn]

Reinhart was a #4 overall pick
16+33 = 49
4 = 4

Which one sounds better to you?

Flames got a solid dman with their picks. You guys got a guy who even sucks in the ahl. Flames got the better deal by far.

 

[CraigsList]

Reinhart was a #4 overall pick
16+33 = 49
4 = 4

Which one sounds better to you?

I'll take the guy who actually plays in the NHL. And I didn't even have to mention that he's a top 4 defenseman plays pretty well for his position. Is this even a serious question?

 

[DomBarr]

Reinhart was a #4 overall pick
16+33 = 49
4 = 4

Which one sounds better to you?

The one where the return actually played in the NHL...and as we have hindsight...the pick that took Barzal...

 

[A91]

Obviously that was a joke not gonna bother replying to yall

Oilers got hammered on that trade
Flames did on the Hamonic one too though no denying

 

[DJJones]

Why the hell would Calgary be looking at Hanifin?

 

[CraigsList]

Obviously that was a joke not gonna bother replying to yall

Oilers got hammered on that trade
Flames did on the Hamonic one too though no denying

Lol, no we didn't.

 

[DJJones]

Obviously that was a joke not gonna bother replying to yall

Oilers got hammered on that trade
Flames did on the Hamonic one too though no denying

How so? We got a physical d-man on a great contract. Edmonton got nothing.

The trades aren't even in the same universe. Calgary probably overpaid a 2nd but whatever. We haven't had a 2nd round pick work out in 15 years. Been better the last two years but still want to see results.

 

[BurnEmUp]

Why the hell would Calgary be looking at Hanifin?

Why not?

Then you could also look to deal Brodie for more RW help and promote Rasmus Andersson, who is ready.

 

[Fvital92]

How so? We got a physical d-man on a great contract. Edmonton got nothing.

The trades aren't even in the same universe. Calgary probably overpaid a 2nd but whatever. We haven't had a 2nd round pick work out in 15 years. Been better the last two years but still want to see results.

Isn't Hamonic retiring this summer or some bullshit ? I remember the commentator saying something like that when Calgary played the Rangers last season.

 

[Tkachuky]

Reinhart was a #4 overall pick
16+33 = 49
4 = 4

Which one sounds better to you?

H4LL

 

[DJJones]

Why not?

Then you could also look to deal Brodie for more RW help and promote Rasmus Andersson, who is ready.

So trade both Hamilton and Brodie?

Ballsy as shit. Treliving would have to be super confident in Andersson and Valimaki.

 

[DJJones]

Isn't Hamonic retiring this summer or some bull**** ? I remember the commentator saying something like that when Calgary played the Rangers last season.

Not that I've heard of. I think he was healthier this year than he has been for a while.

 

[SnizzNasty88]

Reinhart was a #4 overall pick
16+33 = 49
4 = 4

Which one sounds better to you?

Hahaha dude are you seriously trying to use simple math to justify that disgustingly bad trade Chiarelli made trading the Barzal pick for two duds? Let alone the reigning MVP Mr. Timmy Hall for a borderline top pairing guy with much inferior impact on the Oilers than Hall with the Devils. That post was just hack worthy, yikes.