Pretty much.
I don't understand trying to say one party is to blame. Really nobody looks good on this one.
- Ottawa looks stupid for making a clerical error
- Vegas looks like a dic for trying to f over Dadonov because of Ottawa's typo.
- The league looks stupid because clearly there are obvious fixes to their system that would avoid all of this from ever happening in the first place.
Let's also keep in mind that this is not a court of law. There is no specific punishment for typo's or purposeful ignorance of typos. It's all at the whim of Bettman. As soon as the media moves on this is a nothing story and I bet nothing much comes of it. Minor fines or at most low level draft picks for both Ottawa and Vegas is my guess..
Despite the fact that less than a handful of players have ever missed the deadline to file their NTLs, therefore voiding their NTC, Vegas didn't think to double check and confirm that Dadonov didn't have an updated list? That's the part that baffles me. Mistakes can happen, some are bigger deals than others, but they can happen. But you, the buyer, don't want to confirm an especially important part of a player's contract? I'm having trouble imagining any scenario on the trade call where you don't ask a follow up question unless Ottawa specifically says "this player's NTC is void".
NHL: "Does the player have a NTC and does it include trade protection to Vegas?"
Ottawa: "That's not a problem here"
Vegas: "Ok great!" instead of "Great but is his NTC still active?"
Then, Ottawa presumably sends Dadonov's contract information including his NTL but it's the incorrect date. Again, no one in Vegas thinks "hmmmm, that's strange, we got last year's list. Can we email Ottawa to ask about the current list?"
Say no one notices the incorrect date and Vegas gets Dadonov's paperwork together for the Anaheim trade, no one looks at his outdated NTL and sees Anaheim on there and stops to say "hey guys, just noticed Evgeni's paperwork has an old NTL but it has Anaheim on it, can we find out what's going on here?"
Vegas had to miss a lot of red flags during the contract review to get to this point even if the initial mistake, a clerical error or otherwise, originated with Ottawa.