There is a defensive zone in hockey. Sacrificing a bit of offense for better defense is a positive especially in the playoffs where noone will care how many regular seasin points he had. Also have to consider Dubois and Bjorkstrand are getting better and better so who knows what could have been. Panarin is obviously happy to be in NY and we'll see if he keeps that excitement if they cant find a way into the playoffs in the next couple yearsI just checked Panarin's numbers and hes having what seems to be the best year of his NHL career 'by far'. While I cant stand NYR and almost never watch their games I do wonder what is it they did that Torts could not to unleash that beast in Bread?
Did Torts fail to unlock Bread's full potential?
There is a defensive zone in hockey. Sacrificing a bit of offense for better defense is a positive especially in the playoffs where noone will care how many regular seasin points he had. Also have to consider Dubois and Bjorkstrand are getting better and better so who knows what could have been. Panarin is obviously happy to be in NY and we'll see if he keeps that excitement if they cant find a way into the playoffs in the next couple years
Offensively? Its possible but 2 way play is better than pure offense. Look at the series vs Tampa or even the fact we are above NY in the standings while scoring 28 less goals. Pure offense is fun but not usually the best thing for team resultsSo what you are saying is that it was Torts's system that was limiting him. Thats what I thought as well.
Offensively? Its possible but 2 way play is better than pure offense. Look at the series vs Tampa or even the fact we are above NY in the standings while scoring 28 less goals. Pure offense is fun but not usually the best thing for team results
I just checked Panarin's numbers and hes having what seems to be the best year of his NHL career 'by far'. While I cant stand NYR and almost never watch their games I do wonder what is it they did that Torts could not to unleash that beast in Bread?
Did Torts fail to unlock Bread's full potential?
I don't know how you can say it's Torts that is responsible for Bjorkstrand scoring less in the NHL than he did in a junior league. I would have to say the talent level in the NHL is more responsible for that. Actually if you want to blame a coach for his decrease in goal scoring you would have to look at Bednar in Cleveland, but that is also a reach since the talent is much better there than the WHL. Look a Fix-Wolansky. He had 102 points last season in the WHL. He has just 10 this year. He has been out injured, but he is nowhere close to the pace he was at in the WHL. Actually, getting back to Bjorkstrand, his 23 goals last season was higher than any Columbus or Cleveland season prior to that. This year, until he was injured, he was well on pace to pass 23 goals this season, and still might do so. He has progressed nicely under Torts, and has improved each season. As far as letting the young guys play their game and play through their mistakes, they have had plenty of chances to do so. Which one is producing at a level that their offense totally covers up their lack of defense? Maybe if they were still at the bottom of the division, out of the playoff hunt, you could let these guys stretch their legs a bit. Now that they are right in the mix, you have to play to get in the playoffs. There is no more time for experimenting.This is a hard question that will be debated until the day he's actually fired (that could still be a long way away). Torts is a good coach with a lot of warts. He's done a great job with changing the culture of the team in the dressing room and he deserves all the credit for that. He holds people accountable but he also wears on people and is stubborn to a fault. He absolutely refuses to get off of his old school mentality and allowing the young players to play their game and play through their mistakes. It's always how they check and play away from the puck. All great players/scorers aren't checkers or defensive players. Playing hands of stone Boone Jenner in OT games for his "faceoff prowess" (he's been really bad at that in OT for a while now) is a perfect example of his stubbornness. Boone is a good player and has a place on every team in the NHL but has no business being on the ice in OT. People have talked about the player Bjorkstrand has become and I say well great...he's turned a 50 goal scoring junior prospect into a 20 goal two way forward. Awesome. They have enough of those type of players and need what Ollie used to be (a dangerous high scoring forward).
I do not want him fired or think he should be at this time but he's not a coach void of criticism even if the team has been winning lately (the players deserve most of the credit for playing total team hockey and winning games just as they deserved most of the angst when they were playing awful for many games at the begging of the season and losing). The goalie play has also been stellar for quite some time and even Torts will admit he doesn't get involved much in the goalie department.
He's been a great coach for this team but I still doubt that he will be the coach to guide them to bigger and better things.
Edit: Also forgot to mention that special teams has not been good under Torts and they have brought in several aides/coaches to help with that.
Exactly. Nikita Kucherov led the league in scoring last season with 128 points. How'd he do in the playoffs?There is a defensive zone in hockey. Sacrificing a bit of offense for better defense is a positive especially in the playoffs where noone will care how many regular seasin points he had. Also have to consider Dubois and Bjorkstrand are getting better and better so who knows what could have been. Panarin is obviously happy to be in NY and we'll see if he keeps that excitement if they cant find a way into the playoffs in the next couple years
Ah, yes. Two points in that series. That's only one more point than he had suspensions.Offensively? Its possible but 2 way play is better than pure offense. Look at the series vs Tampa
I just checked Panarin's numbers and hes having what seems to be the best year of his NHL career 'by far'. While I cant stand NYR and almost never watch their games I do wonder what is it they did that Torts could not to unleash that beast in Bread?
Did Torts fail to unlock Bread's full potential?
He was tied for 17th in NHL scoring last season on a team which had a miserable PP.
Think that you're reaching on this one.
Fair enough.Was simply curious nothing more.
Fair enough.
Panarin's at that age where a lot of players have a career year. He's stoked about playing in New York and is in the prime of his career.
I still want him fired after this year.Yes, I renamed the thread, because it's rapidly becoming our "discuss the coaching" thread rather than just a firing advocacy thread.
Good luck.I still want him fired after this year.
I still want him fired after this year.
I still want him fired after this year.
Hmm but why? And who would you hire to replace him?