daver
Registered User
Not much debate about that really
Depends what season you are comparing:
Nate's first year = Alexis' first year (Nate was one month older but would have had a full year more development under his belt).
Not much debate about that really
Had 17 points in the first 12 games and then 25 in the last 11.
I predicted before the season that Lafreniére would go berserk this season
and score in the range of 145-160 points, needs to continue with this 3 ppg avg for a while thou
and sustain his current 2.5 ppg pace for almost remaining of the season.
Indeed.
I predicted before the season that Lafreniére would go berserk this season
and score in the range of 145-160 points, needs to continue with this 3 ppg avg for a while thou
and sustain his current 2.5 ppg pace for almost remaining of the season.
i wonder what level of production he would need to be considered on mcdavid/crosby level talent coming into the draft.
i wonder what level of production he would need to be considered on mcdavid/crosby level talent coming into the draft.
I doubt there's any level of production that would change my view that he's more of a MacKinnon/Hall level of prospect than a McDavid/Crosby level type of player.
but a good start would be playing a leading role and delivering points and wins for Team Canada at the WJC. And if he can finish the regular season with 120 pts., I'll be sufficiently impressed. Hell, Hockey Canada may even take him to Europe in the spring to practice with the Big Boy NHLers and give him an exhibition game against the Austrians or the Swiss while they wait to fill out the roster with more late arriving NHLers.
my expectation, however, is that he won't be able to force Hockey Canada brass into playing him in that leading role, and he'll struggle to put up points against the older 19 year old better teams, USA, Sweden, the Finns and the Russians. He may rack up a few points against Denmark.
Not even 150-200 points in his draft year???
i wonder what level of production he would need to be considered on mcdavid/crosby level talent coming into the draft.
Nope. In order for me to raise a Spockian eyebrow and reevaluate Lafreniere as a player, he would have to hit pt. totals 150-165 this year. Do at 17 in his 2nd. season what Sid did at 17 years of age in his 2nd. Q. season. I make no allowances for arbitrary NHL dates for the purposes of a pro draft.
I doubt there's any level of production that would change my view that he's more of a MacKinnon/Hall level of prospect than a McDavid/Crosby level type of player.
but a good start would be playing a leading role and delivering points and wins for Team Canada at the WJC. And if he can finish the regular season with 120 pts., I'll be sufficiently impressed. Hell, Hockey Canada may even take him to Europe in the spring to practice with the Big Boy NHLers and give him an exhibition game against the Austrians or the Swiss while they wait to fill out the roster with more late arriving NHLers.
my expectation, however, is that he won't be able to force Hockey Canada brass into playing him in that leading role, and he'll struggle to put up points against the older 19 year old better teams, USA, Sweden, the Finns and the Russians. He may rack up a few points against Denmark.
Crosby did not have a central role on Team Canada in his D-1 year. He did in his draft year and, still, Bergeron and Carter had a bigger impact. I think your expectations of what Lafreniere should do are out of whack.
i wonder what level of production he would need to be considered on mcdavid/crosby level talent coming into the draft.
He'd need to produce a heck of a lot, because from what I've seen he's not on that tier of prospect.
He gets a ton of PP assists this season from playing the point and touching the puck a lot. Last year, he was often used in the high slot and didn't get nearly has many puck touches.
But in terms of how dynamic he is and how he tilts the ice, not at all on Crosby's level. Laf isn't that noticeable on the ice, but he's a very smart player. A bit like Tavares.
Crosby did not have a central role on Team Canada in his D-1 year. He did in his draft year and, still, Bergeron and Carter had a bigger impact. I think your expectations of what Lafreniere should do are out of whack.
Lafrenière could already play pro. He proccess the game like a pro. Always making good decisions, amazing vision and very fast hands. Always well positioned. I think he is not a dominant eye catching fast skater like Yakupov, Hall or McDavid were but he is such a strong skater with always keeping his head up and balance it reminds me Jack Eichel. I think which ever team get him should be thrilled to have such a smart and talented kid.
Lafrenière could already play pro. He proccess the game like a pro. Always making good decisions, amazing vision and very fast hands. Always well positioned. I think he is not a dominant eye catching fast skater like Yakupov, Hall or McDavid were but he is such a strong skater with always keeping his head up and balance it reminds me Jack Eichel. I think which ever team get him should be thrilled to have such a smart and talented kid.
Yeah, Lafrenière will play in the NHL at 18, no doubt about it. His game is NHL-ready. He will have an adaptation period like any player, but I expect him to be a very trustworthy player during his rookie season. He will not need to be sheltered, they'll be able to give him tough minutes and tough assignments. He is that good. I will repeat myself, I see a LOT of Hossa in him.
Yeah, Lafrenière will play in the NHL at 18, no doubt about it. His game is NHL-ready. He will have an adaptation period like any player, but I expect him to be a very trustworthy player during his rookie season. He will not need to be sheltered, they'll be able to give him tough minutes and tough assignments. He is that good. I will repeat myself, I see a LOT of Hossa in him.