Karl Eriksson
Boring!
I love the venom that Karlsson threads invitably spew. Dude is playing great, and it's all hate.
It's baffling how anyone could convince themselves that they'd rather have another defender than EK. He's a league above any other defenseman.I love the venom that Karlsson threads invitably spew. Dude is playing great, and it's all hate.
Unverifiable. Okay. What is verifiable? Have you ever read a Karlsson thread? It's all hyperbole. And Corsi certainly isn't since it uses home rink biased RTSS stats. So what do you want?
We wouldn't have played the same game under Murray, and Sutter. In fact, I have doubts he would have blossomed into the offensive player he is under them which is why we see Doughy's offense sag and his defense improve. You swap the two, and he likely isn't even on the Kings roster because he struggles defensively.
The reason why the Kings won in 12' and 14' was because of defense and structure. Doughty played his role perfectly and played a ton of minutes because he could be relied upon to get the puck deep and play man to man defense. Does that sound like that would ever be Karlsson game? Would he thrive in that environment? No.
Here are the facts as we know them: Drew Doughy has two Stanley Cups and two Gold Medals and one very well deserved Norris trophy. Erik Karlsson has 0 Stanley Cups and 1 Silver Medal and 2 Norris'. If I don't like those facts and you don't have a time machine then all arguments about Karlsson being able to win on those teams on moot. You either win or you don't win.
See how that works? And yes, you're to blame too. You've also used the same flawed argument to prop Karlsson up without a time machine. So without all of the mental gymnastics that you Sens fans and Swedes use where does that leave us again?
Two Stanely Cups and Two Gold medals and one Norris
vs
0 Stanely Cups and 1 Silver medal and two Norris'.
I don't know about anyone else reading this but to me it's a clear choice. I take the winner every time because there is a reason why they win.
He will sign somewhere as a UFA for $12M per in summer 2019, and eventually get his Cup. Or he should.
I love the venom that Karlsson threads invitably spew. Dude is playing great, and it's all hate.
He's the best defenseman of this generation but his defence is suspect.
Hasn't looked great so far this season.
Pick your flavor. 30 mins of perfection on ice vs. 30 mins of dynamic, game-breaking talent. Don't think either choice is wrong.Better than Lidstrom ever was. Karlsson just dominate games in a fashion Liddy never was capable of.
I have defended EK in the past, but his effort level last game vs Colorado on his blocked PP shot attempt was pathetic. Led to a breakaway, the penalty shot. Luckily, no goal.
Wish I could find video of it.
And before all the Sens fans come running in to his defense, I think he is clearly the best Dman in the game. But if you see that play, it was awful effort.
Edit: here is one camera angle of it, skip to 2:27. There was a camera angle from behind the Sens net that showed how bad his backcheck was.
Lol calm down. He's obviously amazing but hes allowed to be criticized..It was awful, but of course what you will no doubt leave out is the extended period preceding it where he dodged and weaved and kept the play alive in the O zone seemingly forever with 2 or 3 defenders on him. That might have a slight impact on his usual race back to backcheck (which he usually wins). But sure - ya, he's terrible.
I can't take anything you say seriously when you throw this out there: "he likely isn't even on the Kings roster because he struggles defensively."?
Ya he's only on pace for like 110 points...