JeffreyLFC
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 10,357
- 7,496
2/3 of this is right but I don’t think concerning is the right word here.Side note... best players for LFC today
Elliott and Carvalho... both u20.
That is very concerning for LFC moving forward.
The Pope injury in extra time is what did it. Had that not gone for a corner, might have ended. Newcastle definitely worked for that point, but I’m not sure I could support that type of play.
Joelinton hit the floor like three timesThe Pope injury in extra time is what did it. Had that not gone for a corner, might have ended. Newcastle definitely worked for that point, but I’m not sure I could support that type of play.
Side note... best players for LFC today
Elliott and Carvalho... both u20.
That is very concerning for LFC moving forward.
Definitely was odd. The post game radio chatter is all over Liverpool for escaping with another subpar performance, esp. at home with Newcastle missing some key players. The time wasting def bit them (NC) in the rear though.Nearly 9 minutes of added time. Laughable.
It is because it means the team is aging faster than anticipated.2/3 of this is right but I don’t think concerning is the right word here.
Something to look forward to.Yeah, and on top of that, it's supposed to be a point of emphasis this season lol. Obviously, didn't catch this match to see the extent of that being/not being applied.
It means the future is bright. Yes they need to fix the present but them being ready is a major positive.It is because it means the team is aging faster than anticipated.
The whole team was bad again from the start.
Went overboard in preseason and paying the price now.
Not at all. Diaz was good. If anything it’s a sign they’re gonna have some studs going forward. Add Bellingham and they’re offSide note... best players for LFC today
Elliott and Carvalho... both u20.
That is very concerning for LFC moving forward.
I think as Elliott, Diaz and Carvalho get settled they’re going to be ok breaking stuff down as wellThe concerning part is that without Nunez we have almost no chance of breaking down a parked bus unless the other team makes some mistakes. We can't play it in the air unless he's there. Took 12 or 13 corners just to get that second goal. Without Nunez it seems the other team can double mark van Dijk and that's the end of scoring chances from corners.
Otherwise those two players being awesome again is great. They're very talented. Also a good thing Portugal has so many quality midfielders because that way Carvalho will get a break during the WC. Would be surprised if they brought him to Qatar. We are going to need him.
I just watched the highlights. That second Newcastle goal did not look offside. They have good reason to be bitter right now.
There’s a new rule about margin of error where if your within a specific set of space (it’s inches I don’t remember the exact number but real small) it’s not called as offside because there’s a margin of error within the technology. That’s why Rashford’s was given.His head is ahead of Gomez's foot and you're allowed to score with your head, so it's offside. But what I don't understand is why Rashford wasn't offside the other week even though it was far more clear than that?
There’s a new rule about margin of error where if your within a specific set of space (it’s inches I don’t remember the exact number but real small) it’s not called as offside because there’s a margin of error within the technology. That’s why Rashford’s was given.
His head is ahead of Gomez's foot and you're allowed to score with your head, so it's offside. But what I don't understand is why Rashford wasn't offside the other week even though it was far more clear than that?
I didn’t see the second goal. I don’t agree with the thought that it’s stupid though. Camera angles make things a little funky so having that margin of error makes sense to me.Yea that's what's getting me because then this goal should have been given too. It's a stupid ass standard anyway imo.
I didn’t see the second goal. I don’t agree with the thought that it’s stupid though. Camera angles make things a little funky so having that margin of error makes sense to me.
I mean same thing. It’s about limitations in the technology.The margin of error isn’t due to camera angles, it’s due to frame rates and pixelations.
It is because it means the team is aging faster than anticipated.