Minnesnota
Registered User
Big time doubt.Didn’t say there was any for you. I said Ehlers was more valuable than Dumba.
If the Jets trade Ehlers, they can get a better return than just Dumba.
Big time doubt.Didn’t say there was any for you. I said Ehlers was more valuable than Dumba.
If the Jets trade Ehlers, they can get a better return than just Dumba.
What's the point of trading Dumba for a LW?
Trading Dumba would be a dumb move by the Wild.
I agree, that after his down year and leading into the expansion draft, I think his value is hurt a bit. I think if he bounces back this year and we wait until after expansion, the return could be better.Trading Dumba would be a dumb move by the Wild.
Than why post about a players trade value if you have no clue?How the hell would I know... I’m not a freakin GM... none of us are. Ultimately this is all for fun for us, or should be, but some take it far to seriously like they have some clue as to what will or should happen.
On top of everything that same poster claimed he had no clue on what Ehlers could return.Big time doubt.
To trade that same LW for a C like maybe Danault.What's the point of trading Dumba for a LW?
Right... so anyways...Nugent Hopkins is terrible at center
RNH isn't a center anymore (because he's not good at the position) so I don't understand why you're trying to force that as a "reasonable" offer.Right... so anyways...
all this thread has proven is that maybe wild should just keep dumba as any “reasonable” offer has been shot down.
Main reason he’s playing wing is because oil is so thin there... otherwise he’d be their 3rd C which doesn’t make sense for his skill set. I don’t think it’s a bad base for a trade. Just my opinion. And for record I am a fan of neither team.RNH isn't a center anymore (because he's not good at the position) so I don't understand why you're trying to force that as a "reasonable" offer.
With that said, why doesn’t wild just keep and protect 4 D (expansion draft)?
What would you consider a reasonable offer?Right... so anyways...
all this thread has proven is that maybe wild should just keep dumba as any “reasonable” offer has been shot down.
With Cirelli maybePlayers like Domi, W Nylander, Boeser (although I’d pass as a Canucks fan), RNH...
Lesser Danault, N Schmaltz, D Strome... would probably want a + added
Cap aside maybe something around Gourde?
Pretty sure lightning don’t have the cap space for that then... would assume they’d prefer to keep their younger cap friendly options and move out Johnson/gourde/Killorn/ palat/mcdonagh types, instead.With Cirelli maybe
It would have to be something like Palat + Cirelli for Greenway + Dumba. Assuming Greenway gets a bridge deal at 2M and Cirelli signs for 6 Tampa saves about 3.5 million against the cap. Not sure if it’s enough of a cap saving time entice them, though.Pretty sure lightning don’t have the cap space for that then... would assume they’d prefer to keep their younger cap friendly options and move out Johnson/gourde/Killorn/ palat/mcdonagh types, instead.
Right... so anyways...
all this thread has proven is that maybe wild should just keep dumba as any “reasonable” offer has been shot down.
I agree with you on this. That posters ideal of reasonable offer are all out in left field that most Wild fans and many others laugh at.Dumba for
1. Something around Danault
2. Something around Monahan
3. Something around Krebs or Glass
4. Something around Frost
5. Something around Cirelli
6. Something around LAs young centers
7. Something around D. Strome
Many Wild fans have been ok with these trades. I can't exactly agree with your comments
A + would be great, but the only real important part of that trade would be Guerin knowing that Danault would re-sign, and that he would do it at a decent number.I agree with you on this. That posters ideal of reasonable offer are all out in left field that most Wild fans and many others laugh at.
So what would be the ideal trade involving Danault and Dumba?
What type of + are you willing to live with?