Nedarb
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2019
- 426
- 729
1 goal in 16 games is better though? Or not worth mentioning? (Danault)Sure do. Doesn't change the fact that being a playoff ghost most certainly effects a players value.
1 goal in 16 games is better though? Or not worth mentioning? (Danault)Sure do. Doesn't change the fact that being a playoff ghost most certainly effects a players value.
Fair enough. That's is what i needed to know.I wouldn’t, personally.
Where did Chariot go? Not really interested in trading Danault for a redundant DTo MTL: Hanifin+
To MIN: Danault
To CGY: Dumba
Montreal is owed a 2nd or something similar in value, at least.
Habs get a good LHD to play with one of Weber or Petry. Left side is set with Romanov, Hanifin, Edmondson.
Wild get a dominant 5v5 C who can cover for Fiala & Kaprizov.
Flames get their RHD and a guy who is capable of 30 goals from the blue line.
Sure do. Doesn't change the fact that being a playoff ghost most certainly effects a players value.
When one guy is a Selke level center and the other is a one dimensional winger?1 goal in 16 games is better though? Or not worth mentioning? (Danault)
You can list Danault at the bottom of the 3 i think these 3 are closer in value for different reasons.No matter how you cut it danault is bottom of these 3. That’s my personal opinion. Solid middle 6 centre but I personally wouldn’t trade ehlers or dumba straight up for him.
There's obviously no trade being made for a guy like Danault without knowing if he would re-sign and how much it would take.Not to the extent that being a year away from unrestricted free agency does.
I’ll use your words here.. “doesn’t change the fact that being a playoff ghost most certainly effects a players value”. Unless it’s against your view point I see. Also one dimensional? Very interesting take. Could be the first time I’ve seen that said regarding ehlers.When one guy is a Selke level center and the other is a one dimensional winger?
Well he played so good defensively that he helped us to get to play 16 games.1 goal in 16 games is better though? Or not worth mentioning? ()
Well, I guess then if they're both "playoff ghosts" then I will take the guy that's the better two-way player. Or, maybe take the guy that plays the more important position.I’ll use your words here.. “doesn’t change the fact that being a playoff ghost most certainly effects a players value”. Unless it’s against your view point I see. Also one dimensional? Very interesting take. Could be the first time I’ve seen that said regarding ehlers.
Over 5 years? I guess congratulations are in order for making the playoffs twice..Well he played so good defensively that he helped us to get to play 16 games.
How much more is your 1 goal worth?
I would prefer that you did, thanks.Well, I guess then if they're both "playoff ghosts" then I will take the guy that's the better two-way player. Or, maybe take the guy that plays the more important position.
When one guy is a Selke level center and the other is a one dimensional winger?
This is what guys say when their feelings get hurt but they can't actually make an argument against it. It's kind of embarrassing actuallyPlease stop embarrassing yourself.
Of course Winnipeg would do it
Are we not talking about THE playoffs and how some players contributed.Over 5 years? I guess congratulations are in order for making the playoffs twice..
Just curious, What 1 position do you need to fill the most ?I'd take Ehlers over Dumba and I'm a Dumba fan and hope my Oilers might be able to snag him. it would likely be for the #14 or perhaps something else but so be it....
You think Danault is a one dimensional player?Sure, if it helps your case to pump up Danaults stats use whatever league he’s played in. I’ll stick to logic and my “one dimensional player”.
Well i don't think he's one dimensional. I think he's quite a good winger.My one dimensional player.. clearly ehlers.
Just curious, What 1 position do you need to fill the most ?
What makes a winger (Ehlers) worth more?Ehlers is worth more than Dumba...and Danault isn’t even close to value for him.
Danault would be a 3C in Winnipeg, not a 2C, so he’s not even a consideration. (and before the Domi fans start, no Domi isn’t either... I’d take Danault before I took Domi). There’s zero reason to include a Montreal in any trade between Winnipeg and Minny. If we don’t have what they need or want, we can move on to another team.