Chance on Chance
Registered User
Cleary: 98%
Bert: 20%
Sammy: 1%
If bert says he'll play for 750k holland will sign him
Cleary: 98%
Bert: 20%
Sammy: 1%
Count me in the same camp that would be difficult/impossible to convince otherwise.
It sure seems that Kenny bringing Cleary back only added to the logjam at forward and actually made the team worse this season by taking a 3rd line/2nd PP spot away from Tatar or Nyquist.
Sure, Holland doesn't fill out the lineup card for each game, but he knew just like the rest of us that bringing back Run DFC to Babcock is like handing 82 heroin-filled syringes to a junkie... there's going to be some heavy usage going on
And God forbid the hints about Danny playing until he's 38/39 that Holland dropped after he signed end up result in an extension after this season... if that happens, then Kenny would making each of those Wings teams worse.
So there's that, I guess
Exactly. If you leave a hungry tiger in a room full of fat and slow children who are covered in honey, you can accurately predict the outcome.
We all knew that Tatar was either gonna get traded or sit in the press box the moment Cleary got brought back.
Do Tigers like honey?
I have been pretty against some of these older guys signings and agree Holland needs to get more ruthless. The Cleary decision and Sammy signing were the most disappointed I have been with him during his GM tenure, third would be trading for Wendel Clark or the Roberta Lang trade.
Lang trade wasn't that bad. Pretty sure he was top 5 in scoring when he got traded and only for a 1st and fleishman
OK, you think Holland has done everything possible to make this team better. I don't, you're not going to convince me otherwise.
Actually, I think he was leading the league in scoring. Might have won if not for the injury later in the season.
Lang trade wasn't that bad. Pretty sure he was top 5 in scoring when he got traded and only for a 1st and fleishman
No. No I haven't. I was confused and to this day I was against not only signing Dan Cleary, but Drew Miller as well. Once again, you're using strawmen. I'm talking about 2009 off season. And it's quite obvious you don't have a legitimate response to my argument therein. The fact you tried to defeat my argument with a suicide attack (sacrificing your own point by stating I don't know anything, either) convinces me. To be frank, I guess I won't understand why people think Holland could have done a better job when they can't identify where Holland could have done a better job.
No. No I haven't. I was confused and to this day I was against not only signing Dan Cleary, but Drew Miller as well. Once again, you're using strawmen. I'm talking about 2009 off season. And it's quite obvious you don't have a legitimate response to my argument therein. The fact you tried to defeat my argument with a suicide attack (sacrificing your own point by stating I don't know anything, either) convinces me. To be frank, I guess I won't understand why people think Holland could have done a better job when they can't identify where Holland could have done a better job.
Doubt it. Lang's icetime went from 21+ minutes to 16+ minutes in Detroit
I posted about it earlier but we have 7 forwards in the next 3 years that won't be able to clear waivers and good ones too that have a real hence of making it in the nhl
That sounds horrible.
Instead of slowly integrating our young talent, we're going to dump 2+ lines worth of kids into the meatgrinder basically all at once.
That's not how you build a team. zzzz
That sounds horrible.
Instead of slowly integrating our young talent, we're going to dump 2+ lines worth of kids into the meatgrinder basically all at once.
That's not how you build a team. zzzz
He could've made a better attempt to keep both Hossa and Franzen. He could've moved Hudler and Cleary (or whatever). He could've made the necessary changes for that to happen. But he decided to keep the depth and go from there.
This team would have been more successful with a top 6 of Datsyuk/Z/Franzen/Hossa with some younger players or even project players than Datsyuk/Z/Franzen/Filppula/Hudler. And that's just 2009-2010.
There's this thing called the Salary Cap. Came into existence in 2006. It made having Franzen and Hossa on the same team impossible. Hudler left anyways, and Cleary was still useful back then.
There's this thing called the Salary Cap. Came into existence in 2006. It made having Franzen and Hossa on the same team impossible. Hudler left anyways, and Cleary was still useful back then.
Cleary had some kind of NMC.
The only realistic option to clear space at forward might have been Filppula. But he had just been signed to a 5-year deal and was an up-and-coming youngster who just centered the team to the cup
I'd rather have a guy who knows how to win and how to get people prepared rather than make a lineup that all fans agree with. I don't think puck possession is the only way to win and while the Wings have moved away from the classic sense, it's still there with the best players.
The problem is talent. Holland hasn't reloaded talent, give Babcock more talented players and it'll be amazing how much better of a coach he 'becomes. Nyqusit and Tatar are good, but it's not enough and if you think Holland has given Babcock enough talent, I don't agree with that.
Most games won since he joined the league, most playoff games won (I think?) olympic gold etc... even though I don't agree with him all the time, I trust him more than I do Holland.
As useful as Hossa? Nope. And teams make room all the time. Sharp, Hossa, Kane, Toews. No problem.
Nah, if the Wings make it clear they don't want Cleary they could've moved him. Cleary loves it here because the feeling is mutual.
That's great. But Babcock isn't the only coach in the league that "knows how to win."
12 coaches have been to the conference finals in the last 4 years.
Look. Understand this.As useful as Hossa? Nope. And teams make room all the time. Sharp, Hossa, Kane, Toews. No problem.
If you guys are sick of them, the Isles will take 'em for sure.... and we'll take Devellano back too!!