Reading some of the goofy trade proposals on the other board made me wonder how guys on this board view Nylander. Is he a lock to be at least a Top 6 already, or does he still have the Patrik Stefan potential to bounce back and forth for a few years before flaking out?
I haven't watched much of him so I don't have much of an intelligent opinion, but it seems like he's shaping up to be a poor man's Nicklas Backstrom (which is nothing to hang one's head about, that's a compliment not an insult). Do people on here think he's likely to reach Backstrom levels, or that's too optimistic?
It is far from being clear. Most people will understand that as 30 to 50 points.
2015-2016
Ovi 50
Kane 46
Benn 40
Tarasenko 38
Marchand 37
Crosby 36
Stamkos 36
Perry 34
Seguin 33
Tavares 33
Forsberg 33
Spezza 33
Bergeron 32
Simmonds 32
Neal 31
Toffoli 31
Saad 31
Gaudreau 30
Panarin 30
Kucherov 30
Pacioretty 30
Eriksson 30
Duchene 30
Palmeiri 30
Galchenyuk 30
Henrique 30
Jenner 30
28 players last year scoring 30 + goals. That is pretty optimistic to say that Nylander has a "good chance" at 30 goals. I would never casually say that any great NHLer has a good chance of scoring 30. Even Perry's 34 and Crosby's 36 didn't come easy. If you say he has a good chance though...
The poster said he would be close to a PPG player and then said he would be a 30-50 player......math is solid. 30 goals 50 assists is 80 points.....that is close to a PPG player.
kadri/bozak are our 2c. he has skills better than either. he's shiftier, better vision than both, better release than kadri, at least as fast n-s as bozak but i think faster and definitely more maneuverable.
he's a 1c. he may not be a superstar, but his ceiling is a ppg. more realistically, i'd say he'll be around career .85 in babcock's system unless the pads make a big difference.
"The fruit doesn't fall far from the trees". Yes a timeless cliche, but a good one.
Look at his dad's career and hope he can be like that.
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=4017
So you want Kadri to be better than he's ever shown the ability to be
The funny thing is, if you had followed Michael Nylander's career, he was a bit of a bust relative to his original projections as a Hartford Whalers draftee...
Should go in the OP
18 year old SHL seasons, > 20 GP
Naslund: 39 GP, 39 pts, 1 PPG
Sandstrom: 36 GP, 36 pts, 1 PPG
Nylander: 21 GP, 20 pts, .952 PPG
D. Sedin: 50 GP, 42 pts, .84 PPG
Andersson: 38 GP, 31 pts, .816 PPG
Steen: 23 GP, 17 pts, .739 PPG
Forsberg: 39 GP, 28 pts, .718 PPG
H. Sedin: 49 GP, 34 pts, .694 PPG
18 year old AHL seasons, > 20 GP
Dome: 36 GP, 46 pts, 1.278 PPG
Pastrnak: 25 GP, 28 pts, 1.12 PPG
Nylander: 37 GP, 32 pts, .865 PPG
Filatov: 39 GP, 32 pts, .821 PPG
Prospal: 55 GP, 35 pts, .636 PPG
Bergfors: 65 GP, 40 pts, .615 PPG
Fiala: 33 GP, 20 pts, .606 PPG
19 year old AHL seasons
Spezza: 43 GP, 54 pts, 1.256 PPG
Nylander: 38 GP, 45 pts, 1.184 PPG
Rantanen: 52 GP, 60 pts, 1.154 PPG
Demitra: 41 GP, 41 pts, 1 PPG
Vrana; 36 GP, 34 pts, .944 PPG
Bergeron: 68 GP, 61 pts, .897 PPG
Voloshenko: 69 GP, 60 pts, .870 PPG
Hudler: 57 GP, 49 pts, .860 PPG
Elias: 74 GP, 63 pts, .851 PPG
Should go in the OP
18 year old SHL seasons, > 20 GP
Naslund: 39 GP, 39 pts, 1 PPG
Sandstrom: 36 GP, 36 pts, 1 PPG
Nylander: 21 GP, 20 pts, .952 PPG
D. Sedin: 50 GP, 42 pts, .84 PPG
Andersson: 38 GP, 31 pts, .816 PPG
Steen: 23 GP, 17 pts, .739 PPG
Forsberg: 39 GP, 28 pts, .718 PPG
H. Sedin: 49 GP, 34 pts, .694 PPG
18 year old AHL seasons, > 20 GP
Dome: 36 GP, 46 pts, 1.278 PPG
Pastrnak: 25 GP, 28 pts, 1.12 PPG
Nylander: 37 GP, 32 pts, .865 PPG
Filatov: 39 GP, 32 pts, .821 PPG
Prospal: 55 GP, 35 pts, .636 PPG
Bergfors: 65 GP, 40 pts, .615 PPG
Fiala: 33 GP, 20 pts, .606 PPG
19 year old AHL seasons
Spezza: 43 GP, 54 pts, 1.256 PPG
Nylander: 38 GP, 45 pts, 1.184 PPG
Rantanen: 52 GP, 60 pts, 1.154 PPG
Demitra: 41 GP, 41 pts, 1 PPG
Vrana; 36 GP, 34 pts, .944 PPG
Bergeron: 68 GP, 61 pts, .897 PPG
Voloshenko: 69 GP, 60 pts, .870 PPG
Hudler: 57 GP, 49 pts, .860 PPG
Elias: 74 GP, 63 pts, .851 PPG
This thread reminds me of the Simpsons episode.
My lock and shoe in of the week.
Most of the same people lately posting the most extreme opinions in these threads.
.
I try not to put expectations on these players. Like Kadri must get 50 or fail. Matthews must win Calder or we wasted our first overall.
Forget the points. Just show us you can play, improve, work together (and get better as a team). Show us you can make a difference as part of the team with your skill set. 20-49, 30-50, 200-1000 will take care of itself.