many say just keep the pick . my problem with that is im trying to build a big bodied team that dominates territory in the rough and tumble play offs , i dont care about regular season games where small bodys thrive on power play minutes adding up to high scoring totals . then they get rag dolled in playoffs , or run down over the years from getting bodied by bigger players . and all the guys there at 4OA are smaller type players . plus none are centers in nhl , maybe rossi but hes very light , short strided and reached = doesnt fit my design . yes if no other choice i take BPA , but if i can trade the pick for a player that fits my design im doing so . for instance many say cozens isnt going to be a high scoring center in nhl , but more so big bodied , good skating and good in traffic . and maybe buffy wants a more talented finess guy like perfetti or rossi at 4OA . thats the type fit im looking for
I don't think this is a terrible take, to be honest, I just think it's misdirected. The biggest need Detroit has is for high quality players. Right now, we have a borderline 1C who'd be an incredible 2C, and two top 6 wingers, one of whom has had a hard time completing a season healthy. There are a bunch of maybes on D (and none who'd be legitimate top 4s for just about anyone else in the league), and they all play the same side. The first thing this team needs is top line and top pair players, of any kind, who fit any play style. If you think Rossi is a top 30 W or C, or at least gives you a respectable 1-2 punch at C, then you have to take him (same with Perfetti or Raymond). If you think Sanderson or Drysdale are 1D-types, then you should take one and hope that future you gets to decide which RD to deal.
The only way you move this pick, IMO, is with additional other assets for a real 1C or 1D (probably someone coming off their ELC and demanding more money than their team wants to give them). And I don't think we have the ponies to add to get the kind of player we'd need.
I think, as Wings fans, we just need to face that this is likely a
much longer rebuild than we'd like (partially because the cupboard was so bare when we started and partially because the NHL has designed a system that penalizes bad teams) and that the
only way out is a mix of dumb luck (hoping Yzerman hits on another Point and Kucherov [while avoiding the somewhat massive number of outright misses], for instance, overcoming the lottery in a year where your top end isn't Yakupov for another) and time to add good players. Trading 4 for anything short of an elite player isn't going to help if that player is going to be 30+ by the time the team finally has enough talent to be competitive.
Long-winded way of saying that the team isn't going to get what it needs in a trade, barring some ludicrous, unforeseen trade/contract demands from someone who desperately wants a house in Birmingham.