- Feb 1, 2009
- 2,453
- 3,351
Very true. Eddie talks a far different game than he played.Eddie O couldn't check his suitcase when he played the game. He should stick to offensive analysis - he certainly couldn't play the game without the puck.
Very true. Eddie talks a far different game than he played.Eddie O couldn't check his suitcase when he played the game. He should stick to offensive analysis - he certainly couldn't play the game without the puck.
i really hope it doesn't become the Bhawks of old where fighting was the usual event at every Bhawks game.A guy that can play a 6/7 role with cinder blocks for fists has value. I promise you the guys on this team appreciate what he brings.
Actually, it was Gilbert who abandoned his good position to try and get a lick in and help Nylander win the board battle, leaving Seabs to defend 1 on 2. Seabs had a choice: attack the puck carrier or stay in front and leave the puck carrier and let him take the puck to the net ... he was stuck between a rock and a hard place. When he went after the guy with the puck it was Nylander's man who got loose off the boards to score.... meanwhile Nylander and Gilbert were left on the boards covering no one. But sure let's blame Seabs once again.
Watch the play again. As I said, it was 1 on 2 and a split decision had to be made. A 1 on 2 that never should have happened if Gilbert had stayed put and let the play come to him. Just because you repeat it doesn't make it a boneheaded play.
Eddie O couldn't check his suitcase when he played the game. He should stick to offensive analysis - he certainly couldn't play the game without the puck.
This is the absolute worst assessment of that play that could ever exist Bobby.
Nylander was in the corner battling, and it's Gilbert's corner... he's SUPPOSED to go support Nylander. Puck support is a thing... and Nylander and Gilbert were both doing their jobs. That leaves Seabs with one job. Defend the front of the net. Don't leave the front. ****ing stay there. You're taught this at 8 years old. When you're the only one in front because your center is floating around with his head up his ass, and your D partner is battling in the corner, YOU DON'T CHASE BEHIND THE NET. Do you EVER see Keith chase behind the net? No, he stands right on the post, and makes plays from there with his stick, preventing the passes from coming out from behind the goal line
Nylander's man getting loose off the boards doesn't ****ing matter. What is he supposed to do? Just hold him there and take a penalty? Seabs is 100% to blame for the goal there. All he has to do is stand there in front like it's his job to do... and that pass never comes out. And he can't even ****ing stand there right. He's that terrible. A buyout of him can't come soon enough. I'll take the damn caphit for the next 5 years just to get rid of his useless ass.
Except he's right in this instance, but by all means, take a shot at him. If you're the only guy in front of the net defending the house, you don't abandon the house to chase behind the net... Ever. Especially when you're as foot slow as Seabs.
As I've said before, this is so basic that it's my biggest pet peeve. No one can score from behind the net. It's that simple.
One ops player beats Nylander and Gilbert and comes out of the corner with the puck, Toews and Saad like deers in a headlight are oblivious to their defensive responsibility and poised to fly the zone... which leaves Seabs to defend 2 ops players. No matter how he plays it, it is still 2 against 1. Standing in front and watching the play unfold was not an option. Seabs could have done the big slide as MM pointed out but if he tried that and it failed he's still get crucified around here. It's typical and laughable, that on a play when so much went wrong the entire blame goes to Seabs.
i left in the 2nd period after the yotes tied it up.
what i notice was the forward were not coming back to back check. look at the replays and you will see it. esp on the 2nd yotes goal.
so a lone d-man battling a 2 on 1 ..... no matter what, somebody or more screwed up.
Actually, it was Gilbert who abandoned his good position to try and get a lick in and help Nylander win the board battle, leaving Seabs to defend 1 on 2. Seabs had a choice: attack the puck carrier or stay in front and leave the puck carrier and let him take the puck to the net ... he was stuck between a rock and a hard place. When he went after the guy with the puck it was Nylander's man who got loose off the boards to score.... meanwhile Nylander and Gilbert were left on the boards covering no one. But sure let's blame Seabs once again.
You say this as if he had two choices of equal strategic significance, which is plainly untrue.
Right. Let the guy skate uselessly behind the net with the puck, forcing him all the way to the other corner, thus giving your teammates a chance to get back into position... or abandon the front of the net, with no one left there but yourself, and leave your goalie hanging out to dry. If I'm Lehner in that situation, I'm walking up to Seabs in the locker room after the game, and punching him in the face. Game should have never gotten to a shootout.
Very true. Eddie talks a far different game than he played.
He’s a young guy trying to scratch out a spot on this team. I loved it, and I’m sure his teammates did too.I thought the way Gilbert went after Demers after the hit was dumb. Take his number, and fight him later when the game is out of reach, or lay him out with a big hit. It did nothing for the team.
I'm sure they did, but it did nothing for the them except make it a tie game when we had the lead.He’s a young guy trying to scratch out a spot on this team. I loved it, and I’m sure his teammates did too.
He’s a young guy trying to scratch out a spot on this team. I loved it, and I’m sure his teammates did too.
The front of the net is the most dangerous spot to score. That’s taught to 10 year olds. The game changes but this strategy will never change.
Plus goaltenders always want their players for 2 on 1’s to take the one without the puck and the goalie will deal with the player with the puck.
I wouldn't say it was very dumb, and it's dumb to suggest he should get sent down for it. I think the mentality on those plays should change though, it doesn't have to be taken care of right away, and it doesn't do much to help the team play better.Same here. But there's sadly many people on Twitter agreeing with him saying what Gilbert did was very dumb and that he should be sent down.
Gilbert called back up.