And you have just been proven very wrong again. Are you ever going to change your opinion based on the overwhelming evidence provided? Or are you just going to keep beating your drum with those earplugs in?
Actually I haven't been proved wrong at all.
Since the 2007 playoffs, I checked the PPG averages for the following players:
Henrik: 0.84
Daniel: 0.82
Toews: 0.88
Kane: 0.97
Perry: 0.90
Getzlaf: 1.07
Thornton: 0.85
Marleau: 0.68
Datsyuk: 0.89
Zetterberg: 0.98
As expected, the Sedins rank at the bottom that group (along with Thornton and Marleau, who haven't won anything either). And that's even counting their demolishing of the Sharks series of 2011.
In addition, the goals per game is where the discrepancy gets larger:
Henrik: 0.20
Daniel: 0.31
Toews: 0.34
Kane: 0.41
Perry: 0.41
Getzlaf: 0.30
Thornton: 0.19
Marleau: 0.38
Datsyuk: 0.35
Zetterberg: 0.43
The Sedin duo averages 0.51 goals per game.
The Toews-Kane duo average 0.75 goals per game.
The Perry-Getzlaf duo average 0.71 goals per game.
The Thornton-Marleau duo average 0.57 goals per game.
The Datsyuk-Zetterberg duo average 0.78 goals per game.
The Sedins once again rank last among duos in goals scored per game, and individually both rank among the bottom of that group.
Each of these players has won at least one Stanley Cup, aside from the Thornton-Marleau duo. It's not surprising that their points per game and goals per game rank closer to the Sedins than any other duo, as neither of them have won a Cup.
Sure, an argument can be made that they have been OK at times, but they have not been good enough to the point where the team can rely on them to carry the offensive load and help them win a Cup. They rely too much on assists to beef up their points, and don't score enough goals between the two of them.