Dahlin vs Heiskanen

Jugitsu

Registered User
Dec 24, 2016
2,241
1,917
Finland
Only thing this kind of thread accomplishes is creating dislike against said players across fanbases. That's a shame because neither player deserves to get nit picked about their flaws and shortcomings but instead should be marveled and enjoyed by everybody.

I never even understood the comparison. Different draft class, different age, different kind of style. And arguably totally different projections of potential. I've loved Heiskanen ever since I first saw him at Liiga but I kind of have to agree to an extent with some of the posters here: Dahlin is in a league of his own. It's really not fair to compare any young D to him. And it's counter productive IMO.
 

valet

obviously adhd
Sponsor
Jan 26, 2017
8,975
5,144
buffalo
Miro is good, but ras is better

Tbh I think miro's game is way less refined, and although he has all the tools to be an elite defenseman, the game just comes easier for dahlin.... By a fair margin
 

Just doink

Registered User
Mar 28, 2018
190
142
Every measure this year shows Dahlin ahead except tied for goals. Go back a few pages and look at analytics. There is actual proof that Dahlin is much better this year. Also, the three game argument works if Heiskanen was better than Dahlin last year. He wasn't in analytics or points. I don't see how anyone can say Heiskanen is better right now. There are no numbers that validate that statement. The numbers suggest the exact opposite. They show Dahlin is pulling away

100% Heiskanen was better last year, this season has just began so we'll wait does the tables turn. Numbers showed that Dahlin played safe minutes in a much weaker team last season, Miro was one of the of main man on a good playoffs-team. I don't know/care how some weird analytics ca prove him better when said all that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elysian

Mackinnonen

Registered User
Sep 6, 2015
1,174
415
Dahlin easily. This is like asking, who is better? Crosby or getzlaf? Ovechkin or kessel? Mcdavid or Eichel? All great talents but the gap is obviously big.
 

sufferer

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
3,710
4,459
100% Heiskanen was better last year, this season has just began so we'll wait does the tables turn. Numbers showed that Dahlin played safe minutes in a much weaker team last season, Miro was one of the of main man on a good playoffs-team. I don't know/care how some weird analytics ca prove him better when said all that.
Funny how widely used metrics suddenly become weird because they make your player look worse in comparison. If TOI meant anything in it of itself, Ristolainen would be well regarded.
 

FamilyGuy716

Registered User
Jun 15, 2011
1,583
29
Amherst NY
100% Heiskanen was better last year, this season has just began so we'll wait does the tables turn. Numbers showed that Dahlin played safe minutes in a much weaker team last season, Miro was one of the of main man on a good playoffs-team. I don't know/care how some weird analytics ca prove him better when said all that.

OK... I'll go along with you, out with analytics. How about this, last year Dahlin averaged 2 minutes less per game yet outscored him by 11 points while being a year younger.
 

Kcb12345

Registered User
Jun 6, 2017
29,510
22,867
OK... I'll go along with you, out with analytics. How about this, last year Dahlin averaged 2 minutes less per game yet outscored him by 11 points while being a year younger.

Both players had 24 points at even strength and then one saw a lot of top PP time. There's your difference. And no, it's not because Dahlin is better. It's because you don't replace one of the best PP quarterbacks in the NHL in John Klingberg in your rookie season.

Feels relevant to mention this now as well:

Heiskanen's points away from Benn-Seguin-Radulov: 20 out of 33 points

Dahlin's points away from Reinhart-Eichel-Skinner: 9 out of 44 points

I do believe Dahlin will be the higher point producer throughout his career, but let's not ignore the facts and pretend he's drastically better. It's closer than everyone thinks they just don't want his precious #1 overall and "generational" title to be "ruined" by someone performing close to or at his level
 
Last edited:

NextYear67

Averaging over a like per post
Mar 2, 2018
1,885
2,057
GTA
People saying Heisk are just over thinking it in typical HF fashion. Its really not close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimboA

Just doink

Registered User
Mar 28, 2018
190
142
OK... I'll go along with you, out with analytics. How about this, last year Dahlin averaged 2 minutes less per game yet outscored him by 11 points while being a year younger.

Year younger?

Dahlin made good points, Miro played better deffensivily while not being bag of sand with the puck neither.
 

FamilyGuy716

Registered User
Jun 15, 2011
1,583
29
Amherst NY
Both players had 24 points at even strength and then one saw a lot of top PP time. There's your difference. And no, it's not because Dahlin is better. It's because you don't replace one of the best PP quarterbacks in the NHL in John Klingberg in your rookie season.

Feels relevant to mention this now as well:

Heiskanen's points away from Benn-Seguin-Radulov: 20 out of 33 points

Dahlin's points away from Reinhart-Eichel-Skinner: 9 out of 44 points

I do believe Dahlin will be the higher point producer throughout his career, but let's not ignore the facts and pretend he's drastically better. It's closer than everyone thinks they just don't want his precious #1 overall and "generational" title to be "ruined" by someone performing close to or at his level

Heiskanen played on the PP but wasn't very good.

The following is from the HockeyWriters...

A major difference comes with each player’s contribution to their teams’ power play. Heiskanen struggled during his rookie season with the man advantage, proving to be mostly a liability and allowing more expected goals than he contributed. Dahlin proved to be an absolute stud on the power play, showing signs of being the elite offensive defenceman he was always touted to be.
dahlin-vs-heis-pp-575x460.png
 

Roksta

Registered User
Jul 27, 2011
990
1,435
Heiskanen played on the PP but wasn't very good.

The following is from the HockeyWriters...

A major difference comes with each player’s contribution to their teams’ power play. Heiskanen struggled during his rookie season with the man advantage, proving to be mostly a liability and allowing more expected goals than he contributed. Dahlin proved to be an absolute stud on the power play, showing signs of being the elite offensive defenceman he was always touted to be.
dahlin-vs-heis-pp-575x460.png


Dont post facts in here the only thing Dallas fans has is their eye tests
 

Alexandrov

Registered User
Dec 5, 2011
1,204
105
Heiskanen played on the PP but wasn't very good.

The following is from the HockeyWriters...

A major difference comes with each player’s contribution to their teams’ power play. Heiskanen struggled during his rookie season with the man advantage, proving to be mostly a liability and allowing more expected goals than he contributed. Dahlin proved to be an absolute stud on the power play, showing signs of being the elite offensive defenceman he was always touted to be.
dahlin-vs-heis-pp-575x460.png

Hol' up. The claim is that when Heiskanen was on ice on power play, the PK team had more shots from higher danger areas than the team actually on power play?? There is no way that is true for any player in the league, right?

"Heiskanen struggled during his rookie season with the man advantage, proving to be mostly a liability and allowing more expected goals than he contributed."
 

Kcb12345

Registered User
Jun 6, 2017
29,510
22,867
Dont post facts in here the only thing Dallas fans has is their eye tests

Heiskanen played on the PP but wasn't very good.

The following is from the HockeyWriters...

A major difference comes with each player’s contribution to their teams’ power play. Heiskanen struggled during his rookie season with the man advantage, proving to be mostly a liability and allowing more expected goals than he contributed. Dahlin proved to be an absolute stud on the power play, showing signs of being the elite offensive defenceman he was always touted to be.
dahlin-vs-heis-pp-575x460.png

Yes eye test is what I used apparently on my post that was just mentioning stats/facts....okay bud you might wanna sit this one out

And you seem to be missing the point. Heiskanen did NOT play on the top PP unit outside of a few times. Playing on the 2nd PP unit on one of worst offensive teams in the NHL believe it or not is gonna have an effect on the players stats. Way to ignore the rest of my post as well. How much PP TOI did Dahlin get vs Heiskanen again? 232 to Heiskanen's 147. That's 42+ more powerplay opportunities than Heiskanen. It's the only reason Dahlin had more points last season. Much easier to replace Ristolainen than Klingberg on the PP
 
Last edited:

Testarific

Registered User
Oct 9, 2019
14
15
Yes eye test is what I used apparently on my post that was just mentioning stats/facts....okay bud you might wanna sit this one out

And you seem to be missing the point. Heiskanen did NOT play on the top PP unit outside of a few times. Playing on the 2nd PP unit on one of worst offensive teams in the NHL believe it or not is gonna have an effect on the players stats. Way to ignore the rest of my post as well. How much PP TOI did Dahlin get vs Heiskanen again? 232 to Heiskanen's 147. That's 42+ more powerplay opportunities than Heiskanen. It's the only reason Dahlin had more points last season. Much easier to replace Ristolainen than Klingberg on the PP
So does Dahlin get a pass for being on one of the worst teams in the league? That should definitely have an effect on his stats.

Plus, you do know Risto is one of the top PP QBs in the league right? He's not great 5v5, but he shines on the powerplay...
 

Kcb12345

Registered User
Jun 6, 2017
29,510
22,867
So does Dahlin get a pass for being on one of the worst teams in the league? That should definitely have an effect on his stats.

Plus, you do know Risto is one of the top PP QBs in the league right? He's not great 5v5, but he shines on the powerplay...

Buffalo was better than Dallas offensively so no he doesn't get a pass for that
 

hairylikebear

///////////////
Apr 30, 2009
4,177
1,804
Houston
Heiskanen played on the PP but wasn't very good.

The following is from the HockeyWriters...

A major difference comes with each player’s contribution to their teams’ power play. Heiskanen struggled during his rookie season with the man advantage, proving to be mostly a liability and allowing more expected goals than he contributed. Dahlin proved to be an absolute stud on the power play, showing signs of being the elite offensive defenceman he was always touted to be.
dahlin-vs-heis-pp-575x460.png

You're not reading the chart correctly. The y axis is standard deviations from the mean. -1 just means his unit contributed slightly fewer xG on the PP than the average unit.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad