1) Does anyone here frequently watch both Dallas and Buffalo games?
2) What metrics are you using to compare the two? (Along with "eye-test" from watching both)
3) Arrive at best estimate.
This pretty much sums up the thread.I'd take Dahlin, purely because ive never really watched heiskanen play.
Heiskanen of course
He may pass Seguin up in goals. Just 1 behind him now
To be honest, he has been scoring for a while now. 9 points in his last 10.BecUse he scored just now it’s changed to of course, lol.
Goals get too much credit for dmen.
Is he going to buy it somewhere with his weekly pocket money or..?Once Dahlin gets a better shot... game over.
because it is a reason to discredit a player who has been better.. because people get so offended if there guy isn't the best for some reasonConsider the following: for those saying that it's more impressive what Dahlin is doing since he is 18yr old while Heiskanen is 19yr old, how it is any different from the rookie season of Matthews and Laine? Back then Laine was 18yr old and Matthews was 19yr old, but the consensus was that it didn't really matter. Why it matters now? Age gap between Dahlin & Heiskanen is 9 months, gap between Laine & Matthews is 7 months, so practically the same thing.
BecUse he scored just now it’s changed to of course, lol.
Not to mention how much better it must be for a defender to develope in Sweden where there are decades of knowledge of developing the best defenders in the world compared to the program which we have in Finland.Consider the following: for those saying that it's more impressive what Dahlin is doing since he is 18yr old while Heiskanen is 19yr old, how it is any different from the rookie season of Matthews and Laine? Back then Laine was 18yr old and Matthews was 19yr old, but the consensus was that it didn't really matter. Why it matters now? Age gap between Dahlin & Heiskanen is 9 months, gap between Laine & Matthews is 7 months, so practically the same thing.
Not to mention how much better it must be for a defender to develope in Sweden where there are decades of knowledge of developing the best defenders in the world compared to the program which we have in Finland.
The program has been recently getting better in Finland but I'd imagine the difference still being heavily in favor of Sweden's which really should even out the 7 months age difference in development.
And let's not kid ourselves that Dahlin is this your typical lanky 18yo player without some real muscle, I mean otherwise he wouldn't be throwing hits out there like that.
That's not how it worksI could see Heiskanen being better in the short term. But in the long term I take Dahlin for sure (I am a biased Sabres fan, though).
I think Heiskanen is probably further along in his development as a defenseman.
Remember, Dahlin only started playing defense at 13 or 14yrs old. He was a forward before that.
So, if he is this good already, after only 4-5 years, imagine how good he could potentially be in another 4-5yrs...
Both are going to be good for a long time and both teams are thrilled it’s their guy.
What a load of shit.Heiskanen is safer and much better defensively. Offensively isn't worse either.
Forwards are almost entirely developed at the top of the draft most of the time...Connor McDavid would of been putting out 100+ point seasons out of the gate if he didn't get hurt his rookie season....Defenseman are entirely different so the comparison is bad.Consider the following: for those saying that it's more impressive what Dahlin is doing since he is 18yr old while Heiskanen is 19yr old, how it is any different from the rookie season of Matthews and Laine? Back then Laine was 18yr old and Matthews was 19yr old, but the consensus was that it didn't really matter. Why it matters now? Age gap between Dahlin & Heiskanen is 9 months, gap between Laine & Matthews is 7 months, so practically the same thing.
He may pass Seguin up in goals. Just 1 behind him now