TheOtherOne
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2010
- 8,276
- 5,273
But doesn't this rely on finite creatures eventually having the collective knowledge to explain or disprove what is alleged to be infinite?Humans lack the scientific knowledge to disprove creationism. I'm not talking strictly about religious mythology here. There are plenty of other possibilities that would qualify as creationism that we simply can't claim to be impossible as of right now. A non-religious person doesn't have the luxury of leveraging faith to support their argument.
If it is so darn contagious how come their is a mega church in the US that has over 7000 people attend their weekly services without face-masks and without social distancing and exactly zero people from that church have anything related to Covid. Something so deadly contagious wouldn't have 7000 people all in the same small part of the world and none of them are catching it. My aunt in her mid 60s who catches everything, including 2-3 flus every single year, has Type 1 diabetes and many other ailments came into contact with someone who had covid and she didn't catch it. If anyone could catch it she would be the one that would and yet nothing. Or how about that virtually everyone that gets it not only survives but have basically nothing more than the flu. Do you wear masks and refrain from normal living for the flu or any of the other contagions that could make you sick. There are countless things in the air known for causing all kinds of cancers, do you wear masks and refrain from normal living for those. Also want to add, the flu which has a cure kills 50-60,000 people every season.
That doesn't even begin to touch that most (95+%) of the people who have it seriously and have passed on were 70+ with known medical conditions.
According to the CDC, covid has a mortality rate of approximately 0.65%.
Yes, which is why the topic of creationism is a discussion rather than an argument for those who are honest enough to admit they don't know much at all one way or the other.But doesn't this rely on finite creatures eventually having the collective knowledge to explain or disprove what is alleged to be infinite?
I've always been a fan of science - it's my career - but I've never understood the claim that human knowledge will eventually explain everything. By definition, wouldn't that eventually require an infinite number of scientific disciplines? Or is it just assumed that an expanding universe (assuming there's only one universe to begin with) has a finite number of things to know?
Considering how fast it's still spreading, the number of infected/dead will be high. We still don't have the real numbers from China and a lot of places with high population densities, so those numbers will be very high by the time the dust settles. My question is what was considered a high mortality rate before the WHO removed the criteria from the definition of pandemic.I'll kick it % rate with you. Influenza (the virus all Covid nay-sayers like to use as a comparison) has a death rate of about 0.1% So covid is 6 times more lethal. That's significant, eh? And, for the ghoulish sake of comparison, don't you consider losing the entire population of Grand Rapids in 10 months significant?
I'm lousy at cooking rice on the stove. For years we had one of those cheap $30 rice cookers that clicks to warm when the weight in the bowl lightens enough as water evaporates off but like all great $30 rice cookers the teflon started flaking off, we lost the little rubber piece that helped properly size the evaporate hole (?), and it started leaving a lightly burned crust at the bottom whose chipping off resulted in more teflon flaking off with it.
Which pushed my family into the dark ages of me poorly cooking rice on the stove. I followed the directions. When that resulted in awful rice I found new directions. Again. And again. And again.
Long story short, we quit having rice nearly so often.
Then I tried it in a pressure cooker. Folks, if you're as inept at rice as I am, or if you've never had rice (WTH is wrong with you?), an electric pressure cooker makes it absurdly easy and crazy tasty. Noticeably better than the $30 rice cooker. Stupid easy to remember ratios (1:1, 10 minutes high pressure). And if you want to throw some onion and orange pepper in with it....it presses flavor from the veggies into the rice.
I have like four cups of rice in the fridge now to take out, cook up some eggs, and make quick fried rice for whatever meal I want. Best of all it gets actual use out of that damn pressure cooker.
Still waiting for that list of the most deadly diseases.
As for the rest of it; you seem to base your views on cherry-picked singular events and events that relate to you personally. Good on the church folk for not being super-spreaders. I'm sure they were all tested to confirm your story.
By that same logic; I hang out in Detroit all the time and have not seen a violent crime (kind of), therefore Detroit is a perfectly safe city! Also, no house in my area has been damaged by a natural disaster so everyone's house must be safe! It's all good in my hood so the entire world must be fine.
I'll kick it % rate with you. Influenza (the virus all Covid nay-sayers like to use as a comparison) has a death rate of about 0.1% So covid is 6 times more lethal. That's significant, eh? And, for the ghoulish sake of comparison, don't you consider losing the entire population of Grand Rapids in 10 months significant?
So the very list you provide would currently have COVID-19 as the 15th deadliest condition in the world, and that's based on an update from early September. So you'll likely see it reach top 10 by the end of the year. And that's not a serious thing to you?Not hard to search for yourself, like at all.
Top 20 death causes in the World 2020 live — Deathmeters
I include both brown and white rice in my meal plan; both of which are the Jasmine variety. I grew up on white rice and started eating brown rice 5 years ago. The body is NOT happy if I only eat brown rice. When I lived in Ohio I would get my rice from CAM International Market. That still a good place?
So the very list you provide would currently have COVID-19 as the 15th deadliest condition in the world, and that's based on an update from early September. So you'll likely see it reach top 10 by the end of the year. And that's not a serious thing to you?
Nobody is claiming that any person who gets within a football field of somebody with COVID-19 will die instantly. But for a condition that has claimed nearly a million lives, can be easily transmitted, and there are fairly simple precautions to greatly reduce the likelihood of transmission...
How is that not an important situation to address globally?
Nothing like that is going to happen at all. Back in July the experts were predicting 2.5 million Americans alone would be dead this year from Covid, and the entire planet is not even close to that figure.
Oh god man. It already has happened: there are 250k dead in the U.S. That's more than the population of Grand Rapids. I wasn't saying the literal population of GR would die. IT WAS A COMPARISON OF DEATHS VS. A POPULATION OF A CITY.
That prediction of 2.5 mil deaths was based on a model of not taking mitigation steps, btw. Anyway, I'm walking away from this one since I try to limit my reparté with people who like to make sense.
Because covid people not going to see doctor for different problems. They simply afraid to get covid-19. Panic also killsNot hard to search for yourself, like at all.
Top 20 death causes in the World 2020 live — Deathmeters
Nothing like that is going to happen at all. Back in July the experts were predicting 2.5 million Americans alone would be dead this year from Covid, and the entire planet is not even close to that figure.
No steps taken wouldn't have led to 2.5 million deaths. What do you think, that those cheap masks most of us wear and staying just a little more space away from each other is some awesome defence against this global pandemic that could end civilization???
Considering how fast it's still spreading, the number of infected/dead will be high. We still don't have the real numbers from China and a lot of places with high population densities, so those numbers will be very high by the time the dust settles. My question is what was considered a high mortality rate before the WHO removed the criteria from the definition of pandemic.
Oh Lawd Hammercy. More fear mongering. They mention 2nd wave incoming...didn't we already have that (more like a 2nd splash)?
NHL fans don’t fool yourselves, the 2021 season is far from a certainty
That prediction of 2.5 mil deaths was based on a model of not taking mitigation steps, btw.
Oh Lawd Hammercy. More fear mongering. They mention 2nd wave incoming...didn't we already have that (more like a 2nd splash)?
NHL fans don’t fool yourselves, the 2021 season is far from a certainty
Except, that last sentence you stated is practically what they're saying, just not in such "scary" terms, i,e. potential to kill us vs. killing us.We are currently in the middle of it. Michigan literally yesterday had the most cases in a day they’ve ever had and this is a couple days into it being cold enough to actually entice people to stay inside.
That article isn’t fear mongering. It is a reminder that we haven’t beaten COVID yet.
The logistics of a bubble, which was wildly successful, and of playing a whole season around the league are very different.
Facing the reality we are in dangerous times is not fear mongering. If they said “there will not be a 2020-2021 season because of the virus killing us, that’s fear mongering.