Captain97
Registered User
If Montreal decide to trade Gallagher it will be before the season begins.
Gallagher' will be traded if he's demanding more than .
6 years 37,500,000
6,250,000 per.
I think they'd give him 6x6.5
If Montreal decide to trade Gallagher it will be before the season begins.
Gallagher' will be traded if he's demanding more than .
6 years 37,500,000
6,250,000 per.
Why,he would fetch a likely better return at the TDL no??Also he would offer some support to the kidsIf Montreal decide to trade Gallagher it will be before the season begins.
Take Care.You have no clue. Zero. I get it that there is no confirmation from anyone that he is available, but to come here and say unequivocally that he is not available is just stupid, unless of course you are M. Bergevin?
He wants to get a big pay raise and 7 mil is the highest I would go. Next year, Allen is off the books and Alzner counts less than 2 mil on the cap, so its doable. Tatar is likely gone which saves another 4.88 mil on the cap. Danault at 4.5 -5 mil is more than fair and Armia likely gets less than 3 mil. KK is the big one here, do you bridge or give him McDavid dollars.
He wants to get a big pay raise and 7 mil is the highest I would go. Next year, Allen is off the books and Alzner counts less than 2 mil on the cap, so its doable. Tatar is likely gone which saves another 4.88 mil on the cap. Danault at 4.5 -5 mil is more than fair and Armia likely gets less than 3 mil. KK is the big one here, do you bridge or give him McDavid dollars.
His body won't hold up and the max he can get is 8 years under the new rules, 5 years is more than fair and it brings him to free agency again at age 33-34. It won't be better for him if he gets those 8 years because he's likely finished at age 37-38 considering retirement is 2-3 years away. If his body fails him, he will be looking for a job for 1 mil elsewhere anyways at 37. Not many teams take a chance on him, he's no Joe Thornton or Kovalchuk who were constant 70+ point guys/season. He's not exactly physical either to use as a bottom pairing guy. He's at his prime and Anderson is 2 yrs younger.maybe it's not the big pay raise he's concerned with and it's the term
wishful "thinking" on the part of a bruins fan
Bergevin had always said. Signing contracts isnt hard. They both want different things. I wouldnt be surprised if bergevin wasnt impressed with Gally in the buble. He was awful, and hes definitely not carrying lineIt isn't really just "reports" when the agent comes out and says talks have broken off. Clearly the team and the player are not on the same page at this time.
Take Care.
Go for nothing? What player on the Habs went for nothing? I think you have teams mixed up.
Didn't Krug just go for nothing.
MB said only a week ago Gally will be the Habs highest paid forward.Bergevin had always said. Signing contracts isnt hard. They both want different things. I wouldnt be surprised if bergevin wasnt impressed with Gally in the buble. He was awful, and hes definitely not carrying line
Gallagher has demanded a trade and will be moved within a week.
....see how that sounds?
Bergevin said recently that Gallagher and Danault were guys he wanted to keep but they had a salary cap to manage.
So make up your Gally deals where Montreal doesn't take much cap back. Similar to the Schultz/Stastny/Murray deals we've seen.
7Mx5yrs most likelywell u dont need gally for the next 7 years if he wants 7.5+....
7Mx5yrs most likely
I'm okay with 7×5 honestly similar to the patches contract.
Holy - that's what it's going to take to get Gallagher? $7M now for a 20/30 goal 40/50 point guy? I'd rather have Toffoli at $4.25M You get a bit more bite with Brendan but that's going to cost you $2.75M more?
so if Habs are in playoff contention you trade gallagher for futures? doubt that would sit well with the vets in the midst of a playoff push. i agree if they are completely out of the picture, otherwise it could get messy playing in the final year of his contract
Holy - that's what it's going to take to get Gallagher? $7M now for a 20/30 goal 40/50 point guy? I'd rather have Toffoli at $4.25M You get a bit more bite with Brendan but that's going to cost you $2.75M more?
Get outta here with the talks have broken down!
He will sign a 4 or 5 year deal for 6.25 to 6.5 million.
Click ate crap is all it is.
It was pretty obvious after the Anderson signing that Gallagher would likely be traded. Toffoli pretty muched confirmed it. You have Anderson, Toffoli, Armia, Caufield and Ylonen coming soon, Kids to pay very soon ( Kotkaniemi, Suzuki) they won’t come cheap.
It’s gonna hurt to lose Gallagher, but sometimes it’s inevitable. We got younger, little bigger. Gallagher would be missed but could also bring a very nice prospect.
only concern is when they could possibly trade him, if they make the playoffs they will want to keep him will lose him for nothing. It’s if we miss the playoffs that things become interesting. Every contender would be able to fit him.
philly fan! lol