It was almost too blunt, honestly. That sounded like a question the Toronto media would ask after a bad game "Hey Tavares, you had zero points in a 3-8 loss today, why do you think you let the city of Toronto down today and how does that make you feel knowing that children are going to bed crying tonight after that embarrassment?"
I mean, we're all thinking it, but it was kind of a dick move to put Bednar on the spot like that, when he really and truly does have no control over his goalie depth and has to work with what Sakic gives him. What's he supposed to say? "We know Miska sucks, but it's all Sakic's fault that our goalie depth is crap and he needs to get something done soon so we don't have to play this loser anymore"?
Normally I'd agree but this has gone on for so long that I am 100% okay with Chambers' delivery. The organization needed to be put on the spot there, and while it's not necessarily Bednar's fault, fair or not that was a question asked of the organization and the head coach represents that organization. Other reporters had already tapdanced around the 500-pound gorilla in the room every time Miska shat the bed, it was time to go further.