Critical tought? I was pulling for Juve but as a referee I also admire good refereeing first...and I know the rules and how to interpret them.your posts are boring because you just say the same thing over and over without any semblance of critical thought
Penalty or not. The question is why did the ref allow the play for 11 more seconds after additional time were already done?
Whether it's a good call or not, it's certainly remarkably close. As Hatterson said, this same contact is ignored 99% of the time. Obviously, in my opinion, that means it should be ignored here. Reasonable minds can disagree to that, but that's fine. Edit: I meant that my opinion has been made obvious, not that the outcome is obvious.So when the ref makes a good call ("for RM") it isn´t a good call any longer because RM are getting too many calls they shouldn´t in general?
I wanted Juventus to win almost as much as Buffon did, but that is just silly.
Whether it's a good call or not, it's certainly remarkably close. As Hatterson said, this same contact is ignored 99% of the time. Obviously, in my opinion, that means it should be ignored here. Reasonable minds can disagree to that, but that's fine.
What becomes a problem is that every single time Real Madrid is on the ropes over the last years, particularly in UEFA and particularly at home, a questionable call goes their way. Inevitably.
This is especially galling when players like Casemiro are consistently allowed to foul without any repercussions.
You don't see why that was called a penalty? You don't have to agree with it, but you don't see why?It's just hilarious your appeal to a faux authority.
Sure, it was given as a penalty. That doesn't make it proper. Just like Sane's goal yesterday should have counted.
Imagine if Ronaldo misses the penalty, how do you Juve fans react to the selfish idiotic Buffon reaction?
30min. extra time 10vs.11 that's what would have happened and a less competent goaltender facing the penalty, that's letting your team down.The departure of a legend, unworthy or not it's almost above all criticism.
I mean, yes, that's true, but that's the aggravating part. Big teams are consistently helped by the referees and none moreso, seemingly, than Real Madrid. That's why people are annoyed by it. I don't think people are seriously thinking that Real Madrid is paying referees beyond the lavish gift baskets that are apparently commonplaceI believe there is done research on this. Big teams (relative to the opponent) get calls especially at home. RM are big. I don´t personally believe it is specific to RM - just that they are the "big dog". I certainly don´t believe one team can consistently influence so many different refs, assistants etc. year after year by doing something that I guess the conspiracy theorist are implying.
This is essentially my view, too.Whether it was a penalty or not depends how hard was Vasquez pushed from behind, the leg did not do anything. Considering how easy these players fall down (it is an art really, specially when they're in the box) I am a bit skeptical about the decision.
It's not important at all if it's really heard, a bit hard or not very hard. The fact is he pushed him from behind. Also he didn't get the ball with his kick so that's a 2nd reason for the penalty.Whether it was a penalty or not depends how hard was Vasquez pushed from behind, the leg did not do anything. Considering how easy these players fall down (it is an art really, specially when they're in the box) I am a bit skeptical about the decision.
It's not important at all if it's really heard, a bit hard or not very hard. The fact is he pushed him from behind. Also he didn't get the ball with his kick so that's a 2nd reason for the penalty.