topnotch
Registered User
- Oct 20, 2010
- 1,478
- 1
I know, it's almost hard to believe.
We were horrible in March. In April, we saw flashes of the normal team, but we never really had a complete game and didn't stay consistent. Elliott had been playing terrible and it was rubbing off on the rest of the team. We started coming out of it in the last 6 games or so of the regular season as we switched over to Allen, but we still weren't back in our groove, not to mention we didn't have Steen or Tarasenko.
Game 2 I think was the first time in a while that I saw a complete performance from the Blues. Game 4 was the same. What you saw in those two games is what is expected from them. That's what we should always be like, which is why we say that we can play like that every game. Those games were our norm.
What you are describing are times when the Blues play their best, i.e., not normal. Normal is their average play which includes dominant games, but also includes game where the Blues were dominated.
There is nothing to suggest that the Blues are such a drastically better team than the Wild that they can impose their will. Expecting a hockey team to always play as good as their best games is setting yourself up for disappointment.