There is always randomness involved but I know the Caps strategies and it’s the same as last season. Reirden uses the same x’s and o’s. I don’t care about models and probability—I’m strictly talking about being outcoached. Trotz is the better coach but if he doesn’t adjust his plans it’s over. RBA as you call him, knows what they are doing. It’s even obvious to casual fans. And the Islanders are not skilled enough to even score a goal using it. The Caps got shutout once too. About the missed call— the Canes we’re guilty of the same thing but it was never rectified. Didn’t change the outcome but it also had no consequence in this game.
Having read your post, I actually think we agree on the salient points. I LOVED RBA as a player. True story, as a young man MANY years and years ago playing in a "math simulation keeper league" RBA was one of my prized rookie draft picks.. back in a time when Mark Howe was a veteran D man and RBA was a hotshot rookie on my D corps
so I know he knows the game and I have known for decades that he absolutely has all the hockey chops -- pragma and dogma!
All I would argue is that RBA's edge over Trotz, in a very large statistical sample, is measured in pennies instead of shillings.
The Canes were, in my opinion, the slightly better team despite being road dogs. That should be amazing. PLUS, in addition to being theoretical betters, we also won the die roll. That should ALSO be worth celebrating.
All I want to do is stop anyone from imagining a coaching gamut from 1 to 100 where RBA is 100 and Trotz is 1. 55-45 at worst, IMO.