1909
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2016
- 20,743
- 11,350
So we still lose even if they went 0/4 instead of 4/4. Yay
It is just a more positive-less negative way to look at the result.
So we still lose even if they went 0/4 instead of 4/4. Yay
Stupid* wayIt is just a more positive-less negative way to look at the result.
Nah!Man this thread would be 10 pages long by now, guess the pro tank talk has really died down...
Do you honestly, seriously, think that Niemi may be better than Price?
Sad really! I get the Price contract might be scary, but Niemi is not the hill to die on roflIt's more like they hate Price more than they hate Niemi.
We need Coyle
Our top 6 is small and it shows. Shaw experiment needs to end. Danault isnt very good.
You need to pick your moments...when you lose 7-1...you don't have to spin anything positively. Habs played like crap. That's it that's all. It happens. You move on.It is just a more positive-less negative way to look at the result.
I really want Weber traded. We could get so much for him.I'm curious to see what we can get back for Petry, Danault, and Byron.
I'm curious to see what we can get back for Petry, Danault, and Byron.
What is our record against playoffs teams?
Here's another stat. Remove all of their 7 goals and we win 1-0.I missed the game. But an interesting stat is that if you take away goals score 5 on 4, it's a 2 -1 hockey game...
Think about this: if we remove all of our Losses this season, we're undefeated!Here's another stat. Remove all of their 7 goals and we win 1-0.
Do you honestly, seriously, think that Niemi may be better than Price?
Think about this: if we remove all of our Losses this season, we're undefeated!
Here's another stat. Remove all of their 7 goals and we win 1-0.
We were outscored 2 to 1 5 on 5. The pk clearly sucked, as did the powerplay, as usual. Care to make a relevant non-snarky comment for someone who missed the game? Such as: we were also thoroughly outplayed 5 on 5, it just didn't show up on the scoreboard...
Damn, you got me! Okay okay lets try this:Wins 15
Losses 11
OTL 5
If we remove all of the Losses
Wins 15
Losses 0
OTL 5
We would still have 5 OT defeats
Sir, You’re wrong.